1965
DOI: 10.1016/0003-3472(65)90057-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A statistical analysis of the aggressive communications systems of some hermit crabs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
76
1

Year Published

1968
1968
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
76
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Cheliped displays were good predictors of which species was likely to win an encounter; such displays were used as indicators of the relative aggressive 'drive state' of the animal to claim a limited resource (Hazlett & Bossert 1965). Pachygraspus marmoratus made extensive use of cheliped displays compared to P. gibbesi (Figure 8).…”
Section: Laboratory Investigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cheliped displays were good predictors of which species was likely to win an encounter; such displays were used as indicators of the relative aggressive 'drive state' of the animal to claim a limited resource (Hazlett & Bossert 1965). Pachygraspus marmoratus made extensive use of cheliped displays compared to P. gibbesi (Figure 8).…”
Section: Laboratory Investigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We followed the methods of Hazlett and Bossert (1965), Dingle (1969), Losey (1978), Steinberg (1977), and Huber and Kzravitz (1995), but we limited our analysis to inter-individual sequences since our exclusive interest was to describe the exchange of information occurring between the two interacting individuals.…”
Section: Effect Of the Opponent's Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This analysis furnishes suggestions on whether the BP i influenced the BP j that followed, addressing the question of whether the behavior performed by one crayfish had an effect on the subsequent behavior of the opponent. The influence can be either 'directive' or 'inhibitory' (in a statistical sense without any implication of causation, see Bossert, 1965 andDingle, 1969), when the observed frequency is significantly higher or lower than the expected one, respectively.…”
Section: Effect Of the Opponent's Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations