2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.12.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A statistical approach for the evaluation of thermal and visual comfort in free-running buildings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, this approach provides in output a set of three values for each point of the grid: this can be an obstacle in order to obtain a global and concise evaluation of the space. For example, Frequency of Visual Comfort (FVC), a metric that has analogies with UDI, gives just one value as output: illuminance is averaged on the zone of interest since the aim is the definition of a simplified approach to integrate visual and thermal comfort [72]. It has to be noticed that the criterion of the averaging procedure is not explicit; however, this approach seems interesting and would deserve to be further investigated in future works.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, this approach provides in output a set of three values for each point of the grid: this can be an obstacle in order to obtain a global and concise evaluation of the space. For example, Frequency of Visual Comfort (FVC), a metric that has analogies with UDI, gives just one value as output: illuminance is averaged on the zone of interest since the aim is the definition of a simplified approach to integrate visual and thermal comfort [72]. It has to be noticed that the criterion of the averaging procedure is not explicit; however, this approach seems interesting and would deserve to be further investigated in future works.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intensity of Visual Discomfort (IVD) is defined in [72] and consists of two indices, IVD Over and IVD Under that result, respectively, from the time integral of the difference between the spatial average of current daylight illuminance and the upper limit of visual comfort (E Over is set at 750 lx) or the lower limit of visual comfort (E Under is set at 150 lx). The calculation is performed according to…”
Section: Intensity Of Visual Discomfortmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The minimum difference pertains to the less performing paint ( = 0.45) and ranges around 5-10 ∘ C, but in the case of the best performing paint such temperature difference actually increases up to [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] ∘ C. Furthermore, as shown in Figure 6 for the hottest days of the year, the use of a cool paint on the roof leads to a sensible reduction of the peak outer surface temperature while at night this difference is more limited. In fact, when the solar irradiance is at its maximum (12:00-14:00) and a peak of about 60 ∘ C is reached for the untreated roof, a paint with = 0.45 shows a reduction of 10 ∘ C and the one with = 0.85 has a reduction of 25 ∘ C.…”
Section: Roof Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this aim we will adopt an indicator called Intensity of Thermal Discomfort for overheating (ITD over ), introduced by Sicurella et al [21], which is defined as the time integral, over the occupancy period (from 9:00 to 18:00 for weekdays in this case), of the positive differences between the current operative temperature and the upper threshold for comfort:…”
Section: Thermal Comfort Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two targeted actions were evaluated: one action on the building envelope and the other on the energy production systems. The first typology of interventions are based on the use of constructive technologies, and of building materials with high insulation properties with the objective to decrease both of the energy demand for heating and cooling [6]. The second typology is based on the use of energy production systems with high efficiency as heat pumps and condensing boilers and others renewable energy sources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%