2019
DOI: 10.1080/01694243.2019.1611400
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A statistical comparison of contact angle measurement methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…14 The static contact angle between the lubricating oil medium and the FKM samples was determined by sessile dropping method. 25,26 For characterization of FKM, we used the reflection mode that required ATR accessories. Due to the strong absorption and high refractive index of carbon black in FKM, the ATR crystal Ge with high refractive index was chosen.…”
Section: Characterization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…14 The static contact angle between the lubricating oil medium and the FKM samples was determined by sessile dropping method. 25,26 For characterization of FKM, we used the reflection mode that required ATR accessories. Due to the strong absorption and high refractive index of carbon black in FKM, the ATR crystal Ge with high refractive index was chosen.…”
Section: Characterization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The static contact angle between the lubricating oil medium and the FKM samples was determined by sessile dropping method 25,26 . For characterization of FKM, we used the reflection mode that required ATR accessories.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traditional contact angle method, although used routinely for many years, is proven relatively limited in measuring the wettability of cores especially. The contact angle measurement is susceptible to the surface roughness of the core slice, imbibition effect, the volume of the tested droplet, and oil saturation, as shown in Figure . Thus, it is a big challenge to accurately evaluate reservoir intrinsic wettability. Particularly, when the core is relatively hydrophobic, the increase in surface roughness of the hydrophobic core will probably lead to a conspicuous rise in the contact angle of water droplets, according to the Wenzel model, as shown in Figure a. , Although the rock surface roughness can be controlled by grinding and polishing, the grinding process will also change the physical and chemical properties of the core surface, affecting wettability measurement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kirk et al applied statistical analysis for the selection of the CA measurement method. They concluded that the Wilhelmy-plate method obtained the greatest precision and sensitivity [19]. Bachmann et al found the Wilhelmyplate method and a modified capillary rise method to be reliable [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%