2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jastp.2015.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A statistical comparison of IRI TEC prediction with GPS TEC measurement over Varanasi, India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Okoh et al 10 found that the IRI TEC values mostly related well with the GPS TEC values, with correlation coefficients nearly about 0.9, and root-mean square deviations almost about 20–50% for diurnal evaluations. This situation of IRI-Neq to have the smallest deviations of IRI-TEC values from GPS TEC values compared to IRI-2001 was also reported by Rathore et al 24 at Varanasi, India.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Okoh et al 10 found that the IRI TEC values mostly related well with the GPS TEC values, with correlation coefficients nearly about 0.9, and root-mean square deviations almost about 20–50% for diurnal evaluations. This situation of IRI-Neq to have the smallest deviations of IRI-TEC values from GPS TEC values compared to IRI-2001 was also reported by Rathore et al 24 at Varanasi, India.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The chain of GPS receivers provided an opportunity to attempt an extensive study of the Indian zone TEC, with high temporal and spatial resolution. Rathore et al (2015) found GPS TEC, at the station Varanasi (Geographic: 25°16 N, 82°59 E), to be in good agreement (r = 0.9) with IRI model TEC (IRI-2012). In seasonal variation, IRI model significantly overestimated TEC for the station during the winter season of 2012-2013.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…In this study, the percent deviation (% dev) between the ionosonde and IRI-Plas 2017 model ionospheric parameter data has been calculated by using the expression of the observed value (ionosonde) minus the model value (IRI-Plas 2017) divided by the observed value and times 100. Positive percent deviations indicate underestimation of the models from ionosonde electron density measurements, while negative percent deviations indicate overestimation [ [68] , [69] , [70] , [71] , [72] , [73] ]. The percent deviation (% dev) between the IRI-Plas 2017 model and ionosonde ionospheric parameter data has been determined by using the following equation: where, % dev, Iono Parameters , and IRI Plas Parameters represent the percent deviation and ionospheric parameter values for the ionosode and IRI Plas model respectively.…”
Section: Methodology and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%