2012
DOI: 10.1080/01690965.2010.542651
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A statistical model of the grammatical choices in child production of dative sentences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
50
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
2
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A robust finding accross studies is that inanimate, indefinite, nominal, or longer arguments tend to be placed in the final complement position of the dative construction, while animate, definite, pronominal, or shorter arguments are placed next to the verb, preceding the other complement (de Marneffe et al, 2012). This means, for instance, that if a recipient of the dative construction is pronominal, such as me, it will tend to occur immediately after the verb, triggering a double object dative.…”
Section: The Dative Construction In Englishmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A robust finding accross studies is that inanimate, indefinite, nominal, or longer arguments tend to be placed in the final complement position of the dative construction, while animate, definite, pronominal, or shorter arguments are placed next to the verb, preceding the other complement (de Marneffe et al, 2012). This means, for instance, that if a recipient of the dative construction is pronominal, such as me, it will tend to occur immediately after the verb, triggering a double object dative.…”
Section: The Dative Construction In Englishmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the present contribution continues a line of research introduced by de Marneffe et al (2012), who formulate three research questions:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There is solid evidence that the speaker"s choice for one of the two constructions is motivated by verbal semantics as well as discourse-pragmatic and semantic factors associated with the two objects involved (Thompson 1995, Bresnan & Hay 2008, Bresnan 2007, Bresnan & Nikitina 2009, Kendall, Bresnan & Van Herk 2011, de Marneffe, et al 2012, Theijssen 2012. The results of recent studies further suggest that the extra-linguistic factors modality (written vs. spoken) and macro-linguistic region may also be involved in the choice of order (Bresnan & Ford 2010, Wolk, et al 2012, Theijssen, et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%