2006
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-7-484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A statistical score for assessing the quality of multiple sequence alignments

Abstract: Background: Multiple sequence alignment is the foundation of many important applications in bioinformatics that aim at detecting functionally important regions, predicting protein structures, building phylogenetic trees etc. Although the automatic construction of a multiple sequence alignment for a set of remotely related sequences cause a very challenging and error-prone task, many downstream analyses still rely heavily on the accuracy of the alignments.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Full length bHLH protein sequences of the T. castaneum and one closest homologue from Drosophila melanogaster, Apis mellifera or Gallus gallus were aligned in MAFFT (Ahola et al, 2006) with the L-INS-i iterative refinement option on the MAFFT server (http://align.bmr.kyushu-u.ac.jp/mafft/online/server/). MAFFT with the L-INS-i option has shown to be the most accurate and consistent method for aligning protein sequences (Atlekar et al, 2004; Golubchik et al, 2007).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Full length bHLH protein sequences of the T. castaneum and one closest homologue from Drosophila melanogaster, Apis mellifera or Gallus gallus were aligned in MAFFT (Ahola et al, 2006) with the L-INS-i iterative refinement option on the MAFFT server (http://align.bmr.kyushu-u.ac.jp/mafft/online/server/). MAFFT with the L-INS-i option has shown to be the most accurate and consistent method for aligning protein sequences (Atlekar et al, 2004; Golubchik et al, 2007).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MAFFT v6.603 [28] was used in the alignment employing L-INS-I, which is considered to be one of the most accurate MSA methods [29,30]. Maximum likelihood (ML) trees were built on the MSA datasets by using PhyML v2.4.4 [31].…”
Section: Phylogenetic Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Protein repeats were characterised using RADAR (Heger and Holm, 2000; http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Radar/). Protein sequences were aligned in MAFFT (Katoh et al, 2005) using the L-INS-i iterative refinement methodology (Ahola et al, 2006). Initial formatting of alignments was carried out in BOXSHADE (http:// www.ch.embnet.org/software/BOX_form.html) followed by manual coloration.…”
Section: Sequence Retrieval Alignment and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%