2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05046.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A statistical search for supermetallicity in F, G and K stars

Abstract: A B S T R A C THigh-dispersion and low-resolution data are combined to search for super-metal-rich (SMR) FGK stars in the solar neighbourhood and Baade's Window. The data are assessed by using statistical analysis, with their rms errors playing a key role. A star is considered to be SMR if its value of ½Fe=H . þ0:2 dex, while 'borderline' SMR status may be assigned if þ0:1 , ½Fe=H # þ0:2 dex. Borderline SMR status is assigned to m Leo and three other giants, but no full-fledged SMR giants are found in either B… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These differences are all within the estimated uncertainties presented here and indicate that there are not large systematic differences between this study and those published previously. This result is encouraging, given the challenging nature of characterizing the relatively rare "super-metal rich" stars with their enhanced line absorption (e.g., Cayrel de Strobel et al 1999;Taylor 2002;Gonzalez & Vanture 1998;Feltzing & Gonzalez 2001). Clearly, 55 Cnc is a well-established metal-rich star that happens to be nearby, hosts a multiple-planet system, and exhibits planetary transits.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…These differences are all within the estimated uncertainties presented here and indicate that there are not large systematic differences between this study and those published previously. This result is encouraging, given the challenging nature of characterizing the relatively rare "super-metal rich" stars with their enhanced line absorption (e.g., Cayrel de Strobel et al 1999;Taylor 2002;Gonzalez & Vanture 1998;Feltzing & Gonzalez 2001). Clearly, 55 Cnc is a well-established metal-rich star that happens to be nearby, hosts a multiple-planet system, and exhibits planetary transits.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Curiously, the most metal-rich stars are mainly dwarfs and subgiants with spectral types F or later (e.g. Taylor 2002). Figure 12 shows clearly that the most metal-rich stars in our volume-limited sample are also the coolest.…”
Section: Kinematics and Metallicity Distributionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Buzzoni et al 2001;Taylor 2002;Chen et al 2003). The Fe II-based metallicity of this star is about one dex higher than solar but, given the inconsistency between Fe I and Fe II abundances, and the much higher sensitivity of the Fe II lines to temperature changes, we think such a higher abundance is unlikely.…”
Section: Kinematics and Metallicity Distributionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Another problem is posed by the fact that sample G has an upper metallicity limit that may not be realistic. That limit exists because at present, no giants are known for which [Fe/H] > +0.2 dex at 95 per cent confidence or better (see section 5 of Taylor 2002). Without high‐dispersion data for these ‘super‐metal‐rich’ or ‘SMR’ stars, photometric metallicity calibrations for giants cannot be extended above +0.2 dex (see the notes to table 3 of Taylor 1999c).…”
Section: Samples and Sampling Problemsmentioning
confidence: 97%