2001
DOI: 10.1109/10.951526
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A statistical technique for measuring synchronism between cortical regions in the EEG during rhythmic stimulation

Abstract: Abstract-The coherence function has been widely applied in quantifying the degree of synchronism between electroencephalogram (EEG) signals obtained from different brain regions. However, when applied to investigating synchronization resulting from rhythmic stimulation, misleading results can arise from the high correlation of background EEG activity. We, thus propose a modified measure, which emphasizes the synchronized stimulus responses and reduces the influence of the spontaneous EEG activity. Critical val… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is clear that they are much less evident than the evoked responses. It has been shown [36] that power analyses are less sensitive in response detection than methods that include phase information such as coherent averaging or coherence, so in the next step the existence of induced activity was investigated using coherence analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, it is clear that they are much less evident than the evoked responses. It has been shown [36] that power analyses are less sensitive in response detection than methods that include phase information such as coherent averaging or coherence, so in the next step the existence of induced activity was investigated using coherence analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference between the results coming from the two methods (power and coherence) may imply either that the coherence is a more sensitive method than power analyses (as [36] also claims) for detecting induced activity in the signal or that there is little increase or decrease in the power in beta frequency band but that there is phase synchronisation in the [0.2 0.6] s time range which can be picked up by coherence but not power analyses. It has been repeatedly suggested [44] that evoked responses may be the result of synchronisation of the phase in on-going EEG activity rather than additive neuronal activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The confidence intervals of r 2 were calculated by using a modified method reported by Miranda de Sá et al 14 . In practice, r 2 values > 0.6 were considered significant.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%