2018
DOI: 10.2983/035.037.0415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Status Review of Pinto Abalone (Haliotis kamtschatkana) Along the West Coastof North America: Interpreting Trends, Addressing Uncertainty, and Assessing Risk for a Wide-Ranging Marine Invertebrate

Abstract: BioOne Complete (complete.BioOne.org) is a full-text database of 200 subscribed and open-access titles in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While Rugoconites is more common in the ORS Facies, it is found in numerous environments with no apparent preference for substrate, suggesting that a selective larval stage is unlikely. Most benthic invertebrates need to be near a conspecific to reproduce sexually, whether the distance is centimeters, millimeters, or kilometers in scale, although, there are taxa with reproductive ranges that are over thousands of kilometers in scale (Davis and Campbell 1996; Takabayashi et al 2002; Neuman et al 2018; Rodriguez-Perez et al 2020). The specific reproductive range of Rugoconites is unknown; however, the common occurrence of single or dispersed pairs of Rugoconites on surfaces is not consistent with larval stages settling in locations relatively near conspecifics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While Rugoconites is more common in the ORS Facies, it is found in numerous environments with no apparent preference for substrate, suggesting that a selective larval stage is unlikely. Most benthic invertebrates need to be near a conspecific to reproduce sexually, whether the distance is centimeters, millimeters, or kilometers in scale, although, there are taxa with reproductive ranges that are over thousands of kilometers in scale (Davis and Campbell 1996; Takabayashi et al 2002; Neuman et al 2018; Rodriguez-Perez et al 2020). The specific reproductive range of Rugoconites is unknown; however, the common occurrence of single or dispersed pairs of Rugoconites on surfaces is not consistent with larval stages settling in locations relatively near conspecifics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along the Pacific Coast of North America, all of the seven extant abalone species are listed by the IUCN Red List as either endangered or critically endangered (Peters & Rogers‐Bennett, 2021). The widest ranging of these species, pinto or northern abalone ( Haliotis kamtschatkana Jonas, 1845), have become rare in many parts of their range (Neuman et al, 2018). In the State of Washington, pinto abalone have undergone a 97% decline since the early 1990s despite a 1994 harvest ban (Carson et al, 2019; Carson & Ulrich, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pinto abalone (Haliotis kamtschatkana Jonas, 1845), the widest ranging abalone species along the Pacific coast of North America, have become rare in many parts of their range as a result of overharvest (Neuman et al, 2018). In the southern Salish Sea, Washington, USA, pinto abalone have undergone a 97% decline since the early 1990s, despite a 1994 harvest ban .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pinto abalone are now considered threatened with local extinction, which led the State of Washington to list the species as a State Endangered Species in 2019. Federally, pinto abalone are listed as a Species of Concern (Neuman et al, 2018). As with other imperiled abalone species, low remaining populations of pinto abalone in Washington waters are thought to be below critical thresholds for successful reproduction (Rothaus et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%