2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.finel.2009.09.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A steel-concrete composite beam element with material nonlinearities and partial shear interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under the same load, the slip value in the static load stage before the test is less than that in the static load stage after 10,000 overload fatigue loads. On the other hand, under the action of repeated load, the concrete near the stud will increase the void displacement between the stud and the concrete, resulting in the total slip amount of static load after 10,000 fatigue cycles under the same load is greater than the slip amount of static load before the test, which also indicates that the test beam has accumulated damage after the overlimit fatigue load [17,18]. 4(a)).…”
Section: Slip Test Results Of Test Beam Under Overlimit Staticmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the same load, the slip value in the static load stage before the test is less than that in the static load stage after 10,000 overload fatigue loads. On the other hand, under the action of repeated load, the concrete near the stud will increase the void displacement between the stud and the concrete, resulting in the total slip amount of static load after 10,000 fatigue cycles under the same load is greater than the slip amount of static load before the test, which also indicates that the test beam has accumulated damage after the overlimit fatigue load [17,18]. 4(a)).…”
Section: Slip Test Results Of Test Beam Under Overlimit Staticmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many numerical approaches have been developed for modelling of sandwich panels [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33],…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with different approaches pursued for representation of the interlayer behaviour. The most common approaches are those that utilise contact or interface elements and those that utilise solid elements [25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. Some few studies assumed a perfect bond/composite action between the faces [34], however such assumption is not valid for most timber-concrete sandwich panels and thus those approaches are not discussed further in this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9][10][11][12] Specific applications have been proposed for composite shafts, 13,14 thinwalled laminated box beams, 15 and reinforced concrete structures. 16 Although curved members can be simply discretised by a sequence of short straight beams, [17][18][19] a considerably large number of elements are needed just to capture the displacements correctly. Furthermore, regardless of the mesh density, straight beam elements typically miss the stress variation within the cross section that is associated with a strong curvature of the axis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…912 Specific applications have been proposed for composite shafts, 13,14 thin-walled laminated box beams, 15 and reinforced concrete structures. 16…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%