2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12065-020-00549-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A step further towards a consensus on linking tweets to Wikipedia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…GERBIL (Röder et al, 2018) standardizes ED evaluation over multiple datasets in a unifying framework, but does not define the training data and thus only focuses on comparing already-trained models. Similarly, a range of prior works have sought to refine and standardize ED evaluation (Waitelonis et al, 2019;Nait-Hamoud et al, 2021;Noullet et al, 2021;Odoni et al, 2019;van Erp and Groth, 2020;Braşoveanu et al, 2018). In contrast, ZELDA defines the full experimental setup, including training data, the entity vocabulary and other training signals.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GERBIL (Röder et al, 2018) standardizes ED evaluation over multiple datasets in a unifying framework, but does not define the training data and thus only focuses on comparing already-trained models. Similarly, a range of prior works have sought to refine and standardize ED evaluation (Waitelonis et al, 2019;Nait-Hamoud et al, 2021;Noullet et al, 2021;Odoni et al, 2019;van Erp and Groth, 2020;Braşoveanu et al, 2018). In contrast, ZELDA defines the full experimental setup, including training data, the entity vocabulary and other training signals.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%