2020
DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2019.4210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Step Toward Standardizing Clinical Trials of Actinic Keratosis

Abstract: thritis involving the axial skeleton, a teenager about to attend college, a man with Crohn disease, or a woman contemplating pregnancy? Indeed, the raw rankings of efficacy as determined by the Armstrong et al 3 NMA and other recently published NMAs offer a valuable starting point from which to initiate discussions with patients and improve shared decision making related to choosing the most appropriate psoriasis treatment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regulatory agencies require assessment of the CCR of AK lesions as a key clinical trial outcome for the definition of short-term efficacy (4-12 weeks) (26). However, there are concerns that this "all or nothing" outcome measure is often unattainable, and therefore is too rigorous and may undervalue some effective treatments, particularly in patients with large-field disease where it is more difficult to achieve complete clearance (26).…”
Section: Topical Treatment Efficacy Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regulatory agencies require assessment of the CCR of AK lesions as a key clinical trial outcome for the definition of short-term efficacy (4-12 weeks) (26). However, there are concerns that this "all or nothing" outcome measure is often unattainable, and therefore is too rigorous and may undervalue some effective treatments, particularly in patients with large-field disease where it is more difficult to achieve complete clearance (26).…”
Section: Topical Treatment Efficacy Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regulatory agencies require assessment of the CCR of AK lesions as a key clinical trial outcome for the definition of short-term efficacy (4-12 weeks) (26). However, there are concerns that this "all or nothing" outcome measure is often unattainable, and therefore is too rigorous and may undervalue some effective treatments, particularly in patients with large-field disease where it is more difficult to achieve complete clearance (26). As a result, some dermatologists have recommended using absolute or percentage reductions in lesion counts, rather than using binary endpoints, such as CCR, to assess treatment efficacy in clinical practice (21,27).…”
Section: Topical Treatment Efficacy Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%