The Wiley Handbook of Psychology, Technology, and Society 2015
DOI: 10.1002/9781118771952.ch9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Step Toward Understanding Cross‐National and Cross‐Cultural Variances in Cyberbullying

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cyber victimization is defined as experiencing aggressive behaviors via information and communication technologies, such as the internet, gaming consoles, and mobile phones [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. Research has focused on gender as a predictor of cyber victimization, but such a focus ignores the potential influence of contextual and cultural factors [11][12][13][14][15][16]. A more fruitful direction is to examine not only gender but also the impact of gender stereotype traits, defined as behaviors and attitudes that are acceptable, appropriate, or desirable for people based on biological sex, such as masculinity and femininity, on cyber victimization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cyber victimization is defined as experiencing aggressive behaviors via information and communication technologies, such as the internet, gaming consoles, and mobile phones [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. Research has focused on gender as a predictor of cyber victimization, but such a focus ignores the potential influence of contextual and cultural factors [11][12][13][14][15][16]. A more fruitful direction is to examine not only gender but also the impact of gender stereotype traits, defined as behaviors and attitudes that are acceptable, appropriate, or desirable for people based on biological sex, such as masculinity and femininity, on cyber victimization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lu and Gilmour found that the Cronbach alpha of independent and interdependent self-construals was 0.86 and 0.89, respectively. Bayraktar [39] translated and adapted this scale into the Turkish language. According to their findings, confirmatory factor analysis showed that the two-factor model had an adequate fit to the data, which means that independent and interdependent self-subscales could be used in Turkish-speaking populations (the Cronbach alpha for the independent subscale was 0.89 and the interdependent subscale was 0.87).…”
Section: Self-construalsmentioning
confidence: 99%