2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.softx.2016.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Stepwise Fitting Procedure for automated fitting of Ecopath with Ecosim models

Abstract: The Stepwise Fitting Procedure automates testing of alternative hypotheses used for fitting Ecopath with Ecosim (EwE) models to observation reference data (Mackinson etal. 2009). The calibration of EwE model predictions to observed data is important to evaluate any model that will be used for ecosystem based management. Thus far, the model fitting procedure in EwE has been carried out manually: a repetitive task involving setting >1000>1000 specific individual searches to find the statistically ‘best fit’ mode… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also acknowledge the need to raise the standards of Ecopath models in a management context (Heymans et al, 2011;2016), with similar standards needed in exploring ecosystem theory (Pocock et al, 2016). Within the last few years, a growing number of diagnostic checks, including the PREBAL checks used in this paper, have been developed to establish best practices in creating and using such models (Mackinson et al, 2009;Darwall et al, 2010;Link, 2010;Scott et al, 2016). These guidelines take into consideration the underlying thermodynamic and ecological rules available to users, recommend approaches to balance an Ecopath model, and how to evaluate uncertainty.…”
Section: Model Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also acknowledge the need to raise the standards of Ecopath models in a management context (Heymans et al, 2011;2016), with similar standards needed in exploring ecosystem theory (Pocock et al, 2016). Within the last few years, a growing number of diagnostic checks, including the PREBAL checks used in this paper, have been developed to establish best practices in creating and using such models (Mackinson et al, 2009;Darwall et al, 2010;Link, 2010;Scott et al, 2016). These guidelines take into consideration the underlying thermodynamic and ecological rules available to users, recommend approaches to balance an Ecopath model, and how to evaluate uncertainty.…”
Section: Model Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fundamental changes to the model structure and behavior would likely occur through the incorporation of indicators to end-to-end models compared to current versions that operate without. For example, including existing indicator time series in the model fitting process (e.g., Scott et al, 2015) or Monte Carlo routine (e.g., Steenbeek et al, 2018) would constrain model outputs, change simulation results, and potentially improve model uncertainty. Much like the integration of harvest control rules for fisheries into end-to-end model MSE simulations, management actions based on systemic properties through indicators can be used in the simulation process to track management actions based on ELRPs (Figure 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Ecosim model was calibrated using an automated stepwise fitting procedure that searched for vulnerability multiplier parameters that maximized statistical fit to observed time series (Scott et al 2015 ). We used observation data on relative biomasses and catches (1974–2015), obtained from ICES (Tomczak et al 2012 ; ICES 2017a ) for model calibration.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%