2014
DOI: 10.9745/ghsp-d-14-00123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A stewardship approach to shaping the future of public health supply chain systems

Abstract: Guiding Principles: (1) Governments should see themselves as stewards of supply chains, providing vision, guidance, and oversight, not necessarily as operators of supply chains. (2) Governments should not be afraid to leverage the multiple supply chain actors and diverse options available; these can be woven into a coherent, integrated system, providing flexibility and reducing risk. (3) Governments will need new skills in leadership, regulation, market research, contract design, oversight of outsourced provid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Commodities required for BNC and resuscitation should be available everywhere births occur; however, many LMIC health facilities lack these commodities and the prerequisites for hygienic practices such as clean water, soap, gloves and alcohol rub. Effective logistic information systems that monitor local and national uptake of commodities and transparent procurement procedures could address some of the perceived barriers [ 54 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Commodities required for BNC and resuscitation should be available everywhere births occur; however, many LMIC health facilities lack these commodities and the prerequisites for hygienic practices such as clean water, soap, gloves and alcohol rub. Effective logistic information systems that monitor local and national uptake of commodities and transparent procurement procedures could address some of the perceived barriers [ 54 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, doing so does not tap the benefits that multiplicity offers in reducing the risk of dependency on a single logistics pipeline and the benefits that competition offers in reducing the number of societal resources spent on ensuring health commodity security. 2 However, in moving from the ad hoc to the extended phase of the roadmap, one may ask: What institutional arrangements should be present at that stage of the roadmap, and how can they be developed? A detailed answer to this question should consider all the constituent functions of logistics systems and supply chains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most telling takeaways from these proceedings came from the committee's chair, Tara O'Toole, vice president of In‐Q‐Tel, who noted: “obsession with cost and profit has now infiltrated our sense of public health and how we are going to take care of each other in the most dire circumstances.” 10 (p44) This is especially important, since one assessment of the public health supply chain has been that in public health, “the bottom line is saving and improving lives, which should be as powerful a motivator for rethinking supply systems as profit is in the commercial sector.” 8 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stewardship does not require the direct control of services and facilities; rather, stewards are responsible for engaging and orchestrating different partners to achieve common development goals 8 . And as is increasingly recognized by public health and has become evident in the initial months of the COVID‐19 pandemic in the United States, the private sector has an important role, and government can learn from the commercial sector 8 . (p408)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%