2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00526.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Stimulus-Oriented Approach to Memory

Abstract: Our understanding of short-term recognition memory can be enhanced by careful choice and control of test materials. Theory-driven manipulation of memory test stimuli, including visual textures, human faces, and complex sounds, minimize individual differences and make it possible to predict recognition performance for specific combinations of stimulus items. This stimulusoriented approach to memory reveals that stimulus similarity plays two different important roles in recognition memory. By exploiting tools us… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, the relational interaction was temporal (as opposed to spatially simultaneous). Nonetheless, it suggests that specific colors can influence the ways other specific colors are remembered, a point that is consistent with work in a variety of domains beyond color [12]. Box 1.…”
Section: Context-specific Features Of Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…In this case, the relational interaction was temporal (as opposed to spatially simultaneous). Nonetheless, it suggests that specific colors can influence the ways other specific colors are remembered, a point that is consistent with work in a variety of domains beyond color [12]. Box 1.…”
Section: Context-specific Features Of Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…a non-matching p ), to draw false recognitions varies with that lure’s similarity to study items: other things being equal, a lure that is similar to one or more study items will attract more false recognitions than one that is dissimilar to the study items (Sekuler and Kahana, 2007). Various experimental manipulations, including manipulations of attention, can alter the proportion and distribution of false recognition responses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, we fixed the similarity of s 1 to s 2 , and applied a “roving probe” technique to the test probes, in which p can take on one of several (in this case, 15) similarity values relative to the study items. By using this technique, it is possible to map out mnemometric functions , indices of memory strength’s distributions (Sekuler and Kahana, 2007; Williams et al, 1918; Zhou et al., 2004). To these distributions, we fit Skew-Normal functions (Azzalini, 1985, 1986; Bansal et al, 2008), which allowed us to directly measure changes in the spread and skew of the observed mnemometric functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This “for-better-and-for-worse” phenomenon has been termed “biological sensitivity to context” (Boyce et al, 1995) or “differential susceptibility” (Belsky, 1997). The sensitive/ susceptible child is characterized by difficult temperament and heightened negative emotionality (Belsky, Bakermans-Kranenburg, & van IJzendoorn, 2007; Belsky & Pluess, 2009), and by heightened physiological responses to social stressors (Boyce & Ellis, 2005). There is also evidence that sensitivity/susceptibility may be influenced by genetic factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%