2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2009.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A stochastic frontier analysis of technical progress, efficiency change and productivity growth in the Pacific Northwest sawmill industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the logs of the same diameter class may give yield values characterized by a low variation [3,11,40], especially in small sawmills where the machine operator manually chooses the dimensions of the sawn wood and the sawing pattern. To confirm the influence on the variation in performance in our study, Helvoigt and Adams [41] reported similar statistically significant relationships between sawlogs and sawn wood when analyzing the productivity by a 30-year study period in the Pacific Northwest sawmill industry.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…For example, the logs of the same diameter class may give yield values characterized by a low variation [3,11,40], especially in small sawmills where the machine operator manually chooses the dimensions of the sawn wood and the sawing pattern. To confirm the influence on the variation in performance in our study, Helvoigt and Adams [41] reported similar statistically significant relationships between sawlogs and sawn wood when analyzing the productivity by a 30-year study period in the Pacific Northwest sawmill industry.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…For example, Stier (1980) examined U.S. forest product manufacturers and found evidence of primarily labor-saving technical change, averaging 1-2% per year over 1958-1974. Buongiorno and Gilless (1980) found that technology change in the paper sector of OECD countries yielded output price reductions of 1.5% to 2.0% per year and that no technology change effect was found for the pulp sector, 1961-1976. Helvoigt and Adams (2009 identified both neutral and biased technological change in the sawmilling sector of the Pacific Northwest of the United States, favoring increased use of capital, at 1% per year and decreased use of labor at 0.6% per year, 1968-2002.…”
Section: Productivity and Technological Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jiang et al [12] employed the Malmquist-DEA to measure the TFP of the Chinese forestry industry from 2004 to 2014 and found that there was a certain degree of fluctuation in China's forestry TFP, but that such TFP held up to growth on the whole. In support of this relationship between TFP and growth, Helvoigt et al [13] employed SFA to measure TFP growth in the sawmilling industry of the USA's Pacific Northwest from 1968 to 2002, their results showing that due to accelerating technical progress, TFP growth was strong over the sample period. Xiong et al [14] used SFA to calculate the technical efficiency of forestry activities in Northwest China.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%