2005
DOI: 10.1109/tap.2004.842699
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A stochastically optimized adaptive procedure for the location of MAS auxiliary monopoles: the case of electromagnetic scattering by dielectric cylinders

Abstract: A genetically optimized technique that fully automates the potentially laborious allocation of the auxiliary monopoles for the method of auxiliary sources (MAS) is presented for the problem of electromagnetic (EM) scattering by isotropic dielectric cylinders with various cross sections. The proposed technique uses as input information not only the geometry of the scatterer but also the exciting field and the material properties of the cylinders are implicitly taking part in the optimization procedure. The resu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It concluded that this method is efficient for small objects and not reliable for large objects. An optimization procedure to the sources' contour shape to solve 2-D dielectric cylinders is introduced in [13]. It concluded that the optimum choice for the sources' contour, to accurately solve the problem, is not necessarily the most economic choice in terms of number of unknowns and simulation time in comparison to MoM.…”
Section: Methods Of Mmpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It concluded that this method is efficient for small objects and not reliable for large objects. An optimization procedure to the sources' contour shape to solve 2-D dielectric cylinders is introduced in [13]. It concluded that the optimum choice for the sources' contour, to accurately solve the problem, is not necessarily the most economic choice in terms of number of unknowns and simulation time in comparison to MoM.…”
Section: Methods Of Mmpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study concluded that this method is efficient for small objects and not reliable for large objects. Also, in [21], it has been concluded that the optimum choice of the sources' contour for best accuracy in boundary conditions satisfaction is not necessarily the most economical choice for the number of unknowns and consequently execution time in comparison to MoM.…”
Section: E Lectromagnetic (Em) Solutions For Open-boundarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method showed that possible solutions for certain problems exist with less number of unknowns than what is offered by MoM. However, the method was proved to be not necessary efficient than MoM in terms of required unknowns and processing time for all problems [9]. Inspired by the previous findings, the use of numerical optimization to model antennas was introduced in [10] by matching the near field of an antenna with equivalent problem of a set of infinitesimal dipoles with arbitrary moments, orientations, and positions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%