2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.mbs.2013.04.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A stoichiometric producer-grazer model incorporating the effects of excess food-nutrient content on consumer dynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
29
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Whether this model outcome (deterministic extinction of grazers under high P input) realistically predicts zooplankton dynamics during P-induced eutrophication requires further testing. The model developed by Peace et al (2013) assumed the mechanism behind the stoichiometric knife edge is a simple reduction in ingestion rate, following the data of Plath and Boersma (2001); however, this assumption is not supported by our data. We found evidence that P-rich food reduces growth rates due to increased metabolic costs.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Whether this model outcome (deterministic extinction of grazers under high P input) realistically predicts zooplankton dynamics during P-induced eutrophication requires further testing. The model developed by Peace et al (2013) assumed the mechanism behind the stoichiometric knife edge is a simple reduction in ingestion rate, following the data of Plath and Boersma (2001); however, this assumption is not supported by our data. We found evidence that P-rich food reduces growth rates due to increased metabolic costs.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…Incorporating stoichiometric constraints and the effects of high C:P ratio into trophic dynamic models has been shown to have major impacts on predicted dynamics (Loladze et al 2000, Muller et al 2001, Andersen et al 2004. Recently, Peace et al (2013) introduced the negative effects of low food C:P ratio on consumers in a modified version of the LKE model (Loladze et al 2000). Doing so created an equilibrium point at moderately high P levels with low zooplankton biomass, whose dynamics are limited by excess food P content.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Loladze et al (2000) investigate the effects of light enrichment on the basic stoichiometric predator-prey model (System (A.1)). Peace et al (2013) investigate the effects of nutrient enrichment on an expanded stoichiometric predator-prey model. It is observed that increasing light levels K causes the prey food quality Q to decrease, whereas increasing the nutrient levels P causes the prey food quality to increase.…”
Section: Asymptotic Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ecologists have made important progress collecting large amounts of data from both lab experiments and field sites to support Ecological Stoichiometry (Andersen (1997); Sterner and Elser (2002); Urabe and Sterner (1996); Elser et al (1996); Elser and Urabe (1999); Elser et al (2000Elser et al ( , 2001; Urabe et al (2002); McCauley et al (2008); Hessen et al (2013)). Since the development of the theory of ecological stoichiometry, a wide variety of stoichiometric food web models have been proposed and analyzed (Andersen, 1997;Loladze et al, 2000;Grover, 2004;Hall, 2004;Wang et al, 2008a;Hall, 2009;Wang et al, 2012;Peace et al, 2013Peace et al, , 2014. Stoichiometric models incorporate the effects of both food quantity and food quality into a single framework that produces rich dynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A wide variety of stoichiometric population models have been proposed and analyzed in recent years describing the intriguing effects of variable prey quantity and quality on the predator growth [2,3,4,5]. Many of these models are related to or based on the so-called LKE model, a concise and elegant two-dimensional Lotka-Volterra type model that incorporates chemical heterogeneity of the first two trophic levels of a food chain by Loladze, Kuang and Elser [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%