2015
DOI: 10.1088/0957-0233/26/11/115007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A strain measurement model using a limited number of sensors for steel beam structures subjected to uncertain loadings

Abstract: The maximum stress of a structural member has been extensively adopted as a safety assessment indicator in structural health monitoring. Due to construction errors in the field and changes in the loading conditions during or after construction, it is impractical to accurately predict the location and magnitude of the maximum strain of a member a priori. To avoid the dependency of strain sensing methods on information of the structural and loading conditions, this paper proposes a strain distribution measuremen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…individual in one generation within the GA framework was set at 400, which is a relatively small number, based on the characteristics of premature convergence in the CNN training for structural response estimation. The number of design variables for determining the CNN architecture was set at six, as shown in Equation (5). The GA population size was set at 36, which is six times the number of the set design variables.…”
Section: B Optimization Results With Two Objective Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…individual in one generation within the GA framework was set at 400, which is a relatively small number, based on the characteristics of premature convergence in the CNN training for structural response estimation. The number of design variables for determining the CNN architecture was set at six, as shown in Equation (5). The GA population size was set at 36, which is six times the number of the set design variables.…”
Section: B Optimization Results With Two Objective Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is an index of the degree of deformation of local structural members when loads are applied on a structure. Technologies that use various strain sensors, such as vibrating wire strain gage [3] and fiber Bragg grating sensors [4], have been developed to evaluate the structural safety [5], [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structural analysis and monitoring methods combined with sensing technology have attracted much attention in recent years, which has made good progress in breaking through the confusion caused by limited sensors, applying fiber optic sensing technology, and other advanced sensing technologies, and so on. For solving the problems of structural identification caused by limited sensors, a strain distribution measurement model and a sustainable strain‐sensing model were established to estimate the strain response of steel beam structures and high‐rise buildings, respectively (Oh, Hwang, Lee, Kim, & Park, 2015; Oh, Kim, Kim, Park, & Adeli, 2017). Considering the number of sensors and their proper locations, optimal sensor placement was discussed for the estimation of modal properties of bridge (Chang & Pakzad, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A typical method to determine the maximum stress generated in structures is to use the strains measured by strain sensors, such as an electric strain gauge, a long gauge fiber optic sensor (LGFOS), a vibrating wire strain gauge (VWSG) and a fiber Bragg grating (FBG) [17][18][19][20][21][22][23], installed in locations where the maximum stress is expected to occur based on a structural analysis. However, the location where the maximum stress is generated in practice may differ from the maximum stress location predicted by the analysis since the location, shape, and amplitude of loads acting on the structures and boundary conditions of the structural members have a variety of uncertainties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%