2005
DOI: 10.1007/11574620_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Strategy for Automated Meaning Negotiation in Distributed Information Retrieval

Abstract: Abstract. The paper reports on the formal framework to design strategies for multi-issue non-symmetric meaning negotiations among software agents in a distributed information retrieval system. The advancements of the framework are the following. A resulting strategy compares the contexts of two background domain theories not concept by concept, but the whole context (conceptual graph) to the other context by accounting the relationships among concepts, the properties and the constraints over properties. It con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is a promising approach also for such tasks as ontology evolution, refinement and instance migration especially in decentralised settings where manipulating of distributed heterogeneous ontologies is a necessary subtask. (Ermolayev et al, 2005) elaborate a strategy for automated meaning negotiation. Similarly to (Atencia and Schorlemmer, 2008) their approach aims at aligning ontologies by parts (contexts) that are relevant to a particular negotiation encounter.…”
Section: Agent-based Solutions For Ontology Alignmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is a promising approach also for such tasks as ontology evolution, refinement and instance migration especially in decentralised settings where manipulating of distributed heterogeneous ontologies is a necessary subtask. (Ermolayev et al, 2005) elaborate a strategy for automated meaning negotiation. Similarly to (Atencia and Schorlemmer, 2008) their approach aims at aligning ontologies by parts (contexts) that are relevant to a particular negotiation encounter.…”
Section: Agent-based Solutions For Ontology Alignmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis was carried out as follows. We compared UML diagrams of the ontological contexts [9] of the corresponding concepts and documented the differences. Discovered differences were further cross-checked in the owl 6 files of the ontologies.…”
Section: Instance Transformation Patterns and Rulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, using appropriate reverse-engineering techniques (such as She et al, 2011;Dumitru et al, 2011;Yang et al, 2009), we can construct such feature models from existing requirement documents and source code with the help of domain experts. Second, research on distributed information retrieval (Ermolayev et al 2005) suggests that similar elements in two different knowledge models usually have similar structural contexts. These two lines of research suggest that in addition to the "local" properties (such as lexical descriptions) of features and program elements the structural context of features and program elements can serve as the other important factor for determining the relevance between features and program elements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%