2015
DOI: 10.7469/jksqm.2015.43.3.397
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Strategy for EMS Service Quality Improvement Using Kano Model and Improvement-Gap Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yoshimitsu et al [24] combined the ideas of the Kano model with prospect theory and proposed a quantified evaluation method of customer satisfaction based on the service expectation information of users. Kim and Riew [25] put forward a quality improvement strategy for Korea's Express Mail Service (EMS) by using the traditional Kano and improvement Gap model to classify and prioritize the service quality attributes. To address the deficiencies of traditional Kano, Meng et al [26] proposed a QKNO method to improve service quality in express service only by building the quantitative satisfaction index and importance index.…”
Section: Kano Model and Its Application In Express Servicementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Yoshimitsu et al [24] combined the ideas of the Kano model with prospect theory and proposed a quantified evaluation method of customer satisfaction based on the service expectation information of users. Kim and Riew [25] put forward a quality improvement strategy for Korea's Express Mail Service (EMS) by using the traditional Kano and improvement Gap model to classify and prioritize the service quality attributes. To address the deficiencies of traditional Kano, Meng et al [26] proposed a QKNO method to improve service quality in express service only by building the quantitative satisfaction index and importance index.…”
Section: Kano Model and Its Application In Express Servicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Formula (20) illustrates the standardization of the discrete SE; formula (21) represents the constraint that only one service element can be selected for discrete SE value. Formula (22) shows that the total cost of the optimal design cannot exceed the budget; formula (23) illustrates that the SE fulfillment level is converted into the achievement level of CR; formula (24) indicates that the range of x j is 0 to 1, and formula (25) indicates that x jk is a binary variable.…”
Section: S Y 1 Ymentioning
confidence: 99%