2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10722-022-01469-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A strategy to identify representative maize core collections based on kernel properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The representativeness of type 1 and type 2 core collections based on A-NE and E-NE have been confirmed compared with those that were arbitrarily selected [32]. At present, core collections of strawberry (F. × ananassa) [12], hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.) [2], and other species [45,46] have been successfully constructed using this standard. Previous studies have included the establishment of the core collection of Chinese fir mainly based on geographic origin [21,47].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The representativeness of type 1 and type 2 core collections based on A-NE and E-NE have been confirmed compared with those that were arbitrarily selected [32]. At present, core collections of strawberry (F. × ananassa) [12], hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.) [2], and other species [45,46] have been successfully constructed using this standard. Previous studies have included the establishment of the core collection of Chinese fir mainly based on geographic origin [21,47].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The upper threshold for emergence is just as high in the biennial and predominantly biennial groups, which demonstrates the advantage of evaluating this custom core collection more closely for agronomically important traits. Agromorphological data has been leveraged to create core collections in sweet potato ( Huamán et al., 1999 ), potato ( Huamán et al., 2000 ), groundnut ( Upadhyaya et al., 2003 ), pigeonpea ( Reddy et al., 2005 ), maize ( Malosetti & Abadie, 2001 ; Li et al., 2005 ; Risliawati et al., 2023 ), safflower ( Dwivedi et al., 2005 ), yam ( Girma et al., 2018 ), walnut ( Mahmoodi et al., 2019 ), pomegranate ( Razi et al., 2021 ), lentil ( Tripathi et al., 2022 ), and Indian mustard ( Nanjundan et al., 2022 ). Corak compared methods for creating custom core collections in a subset of 433 accessions from our study’s carrot diversity panel, and found that custom methods combined with representative methods built cores balanced for genetic representation and enriched for desirable phenotypes, though it is important to note that carrot has low population structure ( Corak et al., 2019 ; Corak, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This percentage corresponds to the average size for core collection development, which is 10%, which is considered to represent the entire collection [33,34]. Previous research on maize core collection development at the same genebank reported that a similar number (11.7%) had retained the entire collection's maximum diversity [35].…”
Section: Linear Discriminant Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%