2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11219-011-9166-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A streamlined, cost-effective database approach to manage requirements traceability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…H. Saiedian has proposed a cost effective tool for requirements traceability management. Though the tool takes more time to develop, it offers several advantages: lesser time in release, minimum bugs, and low cost as compared to other tools available in market [14]. Gea, J. M. has assessed the various tools available in market for requirement engineering process by conducting a survey of different vendors of the tools [2].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…H. Saiedian has proposed a cost effective tool for requirements traceability management. Though the tool takes more time to develop, it offers several advantages: lesser time in release, minimum bugs, and low cost as compared to other tools available in market [14]. Gea, J. M. has assessed the various tools available in market for requirement engineering process by conducting a survey of different vendors of the tools [2].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is to be informed that many of the tools suggested for implementation are only for research purposes and suffer from integration problems when implemented with commercial systems, and are very costly. Therefore, the use of such tools in industry would be very impractical [3,14].…”
Section: Tools and Support For Requirements Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In other traceability approaches, there exit some work related to different tools and methodologies for requirements traceability. Saiedian [26] stated that existing traceability tools focus primarily on requirements traceability or traceability among the various artifacts of a software product, however, there is still an open issue in end-to-end traceability. For instance, Sherba and Anderson [23] proposed a traceability, which has an evolution service that analyzes the changes to a set of relationships over time.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the vast body of knowledge that exists on traceability, traceability practices are far from being mature [17]. Over the years, RT in general and (semi-)automated RT in particular have been widely identified as problematic by the industry [18][19][20][21][22][23]. According to the NaPIRE (Naming the Pain in Requirements Engineering) survey, 32.4% (158 out of 488) of the respondents positioned 'missing traceability' in the top 15 requirements engineering (RE) challenges [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%