2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.cor.2009.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A strengthened formulation and cutting planes for the open pit mine production scheduling problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
29
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
29
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Different methods have been applied to solve the deterministic version of the problem, which assumes that all the problem parameters are well known. These methods can be classified into three categories: exact methods (Dagdelen and Johnson, 1986;Caccetta and Hill, 2003;Ramazan, 2007;Boland et al, 2009;Bley et al, 2010), heuristic and metaheuristic methods (Gershon, 1987;Denby and Schofield, 1994;Ferland et al, 2007;Chatterjee et al, 2010), and hybrid methods (Tolwinski and Underwood, 1996;Sevim and Lei, 1998;Moreno et al, 2010). However, the uncertain nature of the problem is ignored in the deterministic version of the MPSP, resulting in misleading assessments (Ravenscroft, 1992;Dowd, 1994;Dimitrakopoulos et al, 2002;Godoy and Dimitrakopoulos, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different methods have been applied to solve the deterministic version of the problem, which assumes that all the problem parameters are well known. These methods can be classified into three categories: exact methods (Dagdelen and Johnson, 1986;Caccetta and Hill, 2003;Ramazan, 2007;Boland et al, 2009;Bley et al, 2010), heuristic and metaheuristic methods (Gershon, 1987;Denby and Schofield, 1994;Ferland et al, 2007;Chatterjee et al, 2010), and hybrid methods (Tolwinski and Underwood, 1996;Sevim and Lei, 1998;Moreno et al, 2010). However, the uncertain nature of the problem is ignored in the deterministic version of the MPSP, resulting in misleading assessments (Ravenscroft, 1992;Dowd, 1994;Dimitrakopoulos et al, 2002;Godoy and Dimitrakopoulos, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Na sequência, gera-se um índice de priorização de recuperação de cada pilha (que estabelece a sequência das pilhas a serem recuperadas), o qual inicia pelo cálculo do índice de qualidade de cada pilha (Qi). Para cada uma das pilhas, deriva-se um critério (parâmetro) de qualidade e, através da aplicação do fator perda de Taguchi [1], calcula-se o OQEOverall Quality of Production Effectiveness (Qualidade Global Efetiva), onde cada pilha recebe uma nota proporcional à sua qualidade. Na sequência, gera-se uma matriz de setup contemplando os tempos de trânsito da recuperadora entre as pilhas; tal matriz também comporta restrições físicas e dificuldade de locomoção das máquinas recuperadoras entre as pilhas a serem recolhidas.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…To illustrate this, we consider the following scheduling model, which is a special case of the model considered by Bley et al (2010).…”
Section: The Maximum Flow Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the process of deciding how and when to mine the blocks so as to maximize profit (typically the net present value), while obeying the wall slope and precedence constraints, as well as various mining capacity restrictions. Contributions within open-pit mine scheduling, from the view of mathematical optimization, have been given by Gershon (1983), Dagdelen and Johnson (1986), Caccetta and Hill (2003), Ramazan (2007), Rafiee and Asghari (2008), Bley et al (2010), and Cullenbine et al (2011), among others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%