A Strengths-Weaknesses-Opportunities-Threats (SWOT) analysis on the clinical utility of sperm DNA fragmentation testing in specific male infertility scenarios

Abstract

BackgroundSperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) is recognized as a leading cause of male infertility because it can impair the paternal genome through distinct pathophysiological mechanisms. Current evidence supports SDF as a major factor in the pathophysiology of several conditions, including varicocele, unexplained infertility, assisted reproductive technology failure, and environmental lifestyle factors, although the mechanisms involved have not been fully described yet. Measurement of the levels of DNA fragmentation in semen provides valuable information on the integrity of paternal chromatin and may guide therapeutic strategies. A recently published clinical practice guideline (CPG) highlighted how to use the information provided by SDF testing in daily practice, which triggered a series of commentaries by leading infertility experts. These commentaries contained an abundance of information and conflicting views about the clinical utility of SDF testing, which underline the complex nature of SDF.MethodsA search of papers published in response to the CPG entitled “Clinical utility of sperm DNA fragmentation testing: practice recommendations based on clinical scenarios” was performed within the Translational Andrology and Urology (TAU) website (http://tau.amegroups.com/). The start and end dates for the search were May 2017 and August 2017, respectively. Each commentary meeting our inclusion criteria was rated as “supportive without reservation”, “supportive with reservation”, “not supportive” or “neutral”. We recorded whether articles discussed either SDF characteristics as a laboratory test method or clinical scenarios, or both. Subsequently, we extracted the particulars from each commentary and utilized the ‘Strengths-Weaknesses-Opportunities-Threats’ (SWOT) analysis to understand the perceived advantages and drawbacks of SDF as a specialized sperm function method in clinical practice.ResultsFifty-eight fertility experts from six continents and twenty-two countries contributed commentaries. Overall, participants (87.9%; n=51) were supportive of the recommendations provided by the CPG on the utility of SDF testing based on clinical scenarios. The majority of participants made explicit remarks about both the clinical scenarios and SDF assays’ characteristics. Among ‘not supportive’ and ‘supportive with reservation’ participants, 75% (n=30/40) and 77.5% (n=31/40) expressed concerns related to technical limitations of SDF testing methods and clinical utility of the test in one or more clinical scenarios discussed in the CPG, respectively. The SWOT analysis revealed that the CPG provides a reasonable evidence-based proposal for integration of SDF testing in the routine daily practice. It also uncovered gaps of knowledge and threats limiting the widespread application of SDF in everyday practice, thus allowing the identification of opportunities to further refine SDF testing and its clinical utility.ConclusionsThe understanding of the role of SDF in male infertility requires an in-depth analysis of the multifactorial pat...

Are specialized sperm function tests clinically useful in planning assisted reproductive technology?

“…Lastly, it is easy to criticize the SSFTs based on the grounds of low predictive values and variable thresholds (43,44). However, it is essential to understand that infertility is a couple's problem; it is, therefore, evident that a single test from just one side will be always limited to provide the full picture (45)(46)(47)(48)(49)(50). More important is to acknowledge the fact that high SDF increases the risk of an adverse reproductive outcome, even with ICSI, and that the risk is modulated by female age.…”

Organizational flow chart of home care for children with special health care needs

“…These data were categorized according to the indications for the elaboration of service organization protocols (9) .Then, the analysis was performed using the SWOT method (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats) (10) . Subsequently, the points listed were organized according to the 5W2H Action Plan (11) . In the last step, the results were represented graphically in a flow chart.…”

Paternal age and assisted reproductive technology: problem solver or trouble maker?

“…The oxidative-induced damage to sperm DNA usually occurs after the male gamete undergoes the postmeiotic phase. [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44] It has been suggested that an oxidative attack on sperm DNA can result in the formation of oxidative base adducts (e.g. 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine [8OHdG]) and aldehyde adducts (4-hydroxynonenal and 4hydroxyhexenal) on DNA.…”