Proceedings of the 9th Joint International Conference on Information Sciences (JCIS-06) 2006
DOI: 10.2991/jcis.2006.23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A String Comparison Approach to Process Logic Differences between Business Process Models

Abstract: Analyzing process logic differences between company's process and best practice process can assist project team in discovering process improvement opportunities. Process logic comparison has been mentioned in some literature, but research in this area still lacks effectively and efficiently analytical approach. This research has applied string coding and comparison to analyze the process logic differences between business process models. There are three portions in this approach. First of all, all process path… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the ability to start from two predefined process logics enables the technique to be used from bottom up, which makes it possible to replace the expensive top-down approach to cross-organisational process reconciliation. Furthermore, the technique can also be applied in the area of process compliance (Cheung, 2003) as well as process benchmarking (Juan and Ou-Yang, 2005;Juan, 2006), in which customer defined processes are checked for compliance issues against certain standard or bestof-breed process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, the ability to start from two predefined process logics enables the technique to be used from bottom up, which makes it possible to replace the expensive top-down approach to cross-organisational process reconciliation. Furthermore, the technique can also be applied in the area of process compliance (Cheung, 2003) as well as process benchmarking (Juan and Ou-Yang, 2005;Juan, 2006), in which customer defined processes are checked for compliance issues against certain standard or bestof-breed process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If these techniques were applied directly to process reconciliation, they either confine themselves to minor passive adaptations (Krukkert, 2003;Du et al, 2005;Wombacher, 2005) or handle drastic changes without giving user any selection right (Yeoh et al, 2004). Juan (2006) proposes a string comparison approach to tackling process logic differences however the preliminary case study shows that the approach is restrictive because it requires to express the process in digraph form into strings that is on sequential level. Demanded by the interactive and repetitive nature of the process reconciliation task, discrepancies must be identified according to the progress of reconciliation.…”
Section: Process Reconciliation Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Juan and Ou-Yang (2005) applied string coding and comparison to analyze the process logic differences between business process models. Juan (2006) developed an algorithm to search out the alternative process paths in a flowchart and measure the similarity degree of activities contained in process paths compared. Nevertheless, these two methods of comparison are based on selected process path pairs, not on the whole model.…”
Section: Related Research Effortsmentioning
confidence: 99%