2021
DOI: 10.3390/w13213137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Strontium and Hydro-Geochemical Perspective on Human Impacted Tributary of the Mekong River Basin: Sources Identification, Fluxes, and CO2 Consumption

Abstract: As the largest and most representative tributary of the Mekong River, the Mun River Basin (MRB) provides critical understanding of regional hydro-geochemical features and rock weathering processes on a basin scale. The present study measured strontium (Sr) isotopes with hydro-geochemistry data of 56 water samples in detail in the MRB in northeast Thailand. The dissolved Sr contents and 87Sr/86Sr isotopic ratios were reported to be 8.7–344.6 μg/L (average 126.9 μg/L) and 0.7085–0.7281 (average 0.7156), respecti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are two sources of heavy Cu isotope enrichment in topsoil: (a) Cu deposition from the atmosphere to the soil surface (i.e., mineral dust and anthropogenic particulate matters); and (b) Cu exchange from groundwater to surface water during the dry seasons as Cu (II) is more soluble than Cu (I) and has greater leaching loss to groundwater (Vance et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2022). Given that the precipitation in the dry season of MRB is negligible compared with the weathering of element cycling (S. Zhang et al., 2021), and that the enrichment of Fe, Mn, and Cu is low in the topsoil of the S1 and S2 profiles (Figure 3), the atmospheric deposition could not result in heavy isotope pools.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two sources of heavy Cu isotope enrichment in topsoil: (a) Cu deposition from the atmosphere to the soil surface (i.e., mineral dust and anthropogenic particulate matters); and (b) Cu exchange from groundwater to surface water during the dry seasons as Cu (II) is more soluble than Cu (I) and has greater leaching loss to groundwater (Vance et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2022). Given that the precipitation in the dry season of MRB is negligible compared with the weathering of element cycling (S. Zhang et al., 2021), and that the enrichment of Fe, Mn, and Cu is low in the topsoil of the S1 and S2 profiles (Figure 3), the atmospheric deposition could not result in heavy isotope pools.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pH in the dry season ranged from 6.1 to 7.7, with an average of 7.0 [45], and the pH in the midstream (6.6) was lower than upstream (7.1) and downstream (7.1). The pH in the wet season varied from 6.4 to 7.7, with an average of 6.9 [29], and the pH in the midstream (6.6) was lower than upstream (7.4) and downstream (6.7).…”
Section: Temporal and Spatial Variations In Ph Do And Docmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Figure 2. (a) Dissolved oxygen (DO) and (b) Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in the upstream, midstream and downstream of Mun River (MR) during dry and wet season; data are from[29,45].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results are similar to the findings of other scholars. However, the concentrations of Na + and Cl − are underestimated in the ionic content [43][44][45], which may be related to the fact that the fraction of NaCl content was not recorded in the soil data survey. In addition, as can be seen in Figure 7C,E,H, the concentrations of Mg 2+ , K + , and HCO 3 − show an increasing trend from year to year.…”
Section: Changes In Drainage and Salt Dischargementioning
confidence: 99%