1997
DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A structural and functional comparison of staphylococcal enterotoxins A and C2 reveals remarkable similarity and dissimilarity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
16
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
3
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, we assume that residues 11-18, particularly aa 13-18, are significant for SEC2 activity. Crystallographic studies have shown that aa 13-18 of SEC2 comprise a helix (a2) that could stabilize the conformation of the region participating in both MHC II and T-cell receptor binding (Schad et al, 1997;Papageorgiou et al, 2004). In this study, we deleted aa 1-13 of SEC2 and found that the deletion did not affect the T-cell proliferation activity, thereby confirming our assumption.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, we assume that residues 11-18, particularly aa 13-18, are significant for SEC2 activity. Crystallographic studies have shown that aa 13-18 of SEC2 comprise a helix (a2) that could stabilize the conformation of the region participating in both MHC II and T-cell receptor binding (Schad et al, 1997;Papageorgiou et al, 2004). In this study, we deleted aa 1-13 of SEC2 and found that the deletion did not affect the T-cell proliferation activity, thereby confirming our assumption.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…*P,0.05 compared with the SEC2 group at same time point. three b-sheets (b6, b7 and b8; Schad et al, 1997), among which only b8 is a possible binding site for the MHC molecule. Thus, we assumed that aa 129-163 were also not required for the T-cell proliferation activity of SEC2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, despite considerable sequence dissimilarity between TSST-1 and the other SEs, their crystal structures reveal striking similarities in conformational architecture (26,27,36,37). For example, TSST-1 and the other PTSAgs all exhibit a two-domain structure with a C-terminal ␤-grasp motif (domain A), a characteristic N-terminal clawlike ␤ barrel (domain B), and a long diagonal ␣ helix separating these two domains (30,31,38).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interaction of toxic shock syndrome toxin with MHCII differed from that of SEB in that it spanned the antigen-binding cleft and was influenced by the peptides present in the antigenbinding cleft [2,3]. The discovery that Zn 2ϩ ions participated in the superantigen binding process [4,5], coupled with the availability of high-resolution crystal structures [6][7][8] indicate that multiple epitopes on MHCII would be important to regulatory function of these molecules. Indeed, mutagenesis of amino acid residues 47, 187, or 225 of SEA attenuated the stimulatory activity of the molecule, apparently by disrupting cross-linking [5], and provided an explanation for our 1991 observations that SEA was a more potent agonist than SEB [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%