2011
DOI: 10.1002/prot.23201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A structural and functional dissection of the cardiac stress response factor MS1

Abstract: MS1 is a protein predominantly expressed in cardiac and skeletal muscle that is upregulated in response to stress and contributes to development of hypertrophy. In the aortic banding model of left ventricular hypertrophy, its cardiac expression was significantly upregulated within 1 h. Its function is postulated to depend on its F-actin binding ability, located to the C-terminal half of the protein, which promotes stabilization of F-actin in the cell thus releasing myocardin-related transcription factors to th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, enrichment analysis revealed that ABRACL is mostly enriched in some signaling pathways, such as cell cycle, TNFR pathway, proteasome degradation, and mitochondrial pathway (Wang et al, 2019). Studies have found that ABRACL bears a similar structure to ABD2 and may be a transcriptional synergistic activator (Fogl et al, 2012, Galkin et al, 2008, Lin et al, 2011) that is closely related to cell cycle (Baumann et al, 2018). In this study, dual-luciferase reporter assay demonstrated that ABRACL was a direct target of and negatively regulated by miR-145-5p.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Meanwhile, enrichment analysis revealed that ABRACL is mostly enriched in some signaling pathways, such as cell cycle, TNFR pathway, proteasome degradation, and mitochondrial pathway (Wang et al, 2019). Studies have found that ABRACL bears a similar structure to ABD2 and may be a transcriptional synergistic activator (Fogl et al, 2012, Galkin et al, 2008, Lin et al, 2011) that is closely related to cell cycle (Baumann et al, 2018). In this study, dual-luciferase reporter assay demonstrated that ABRACL was a direct target of and negatively regulated by miR-145-5p.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…These regions contain two independent F-actin binding domains, actin binding domain 1 and 2 (ABD1/ABD2) (Fogl et al, 2011). ABD1 (fragment 193–296) binds with higher affinity to F-actin when compared to ABD2.…”
Section: Localization and Activation Of Starsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ABD1 (fragment 193–296) binds with higher affinity to F-actin when compared to ABD2. ABD1 does not adopt a well-folded structure until it is bound to F-actin (Fogl et al, 2011), while ABD2 (fragment 294–375), the most C-terminal fragment, is independently folded (Fogl et al, 2011). It has been hypothesized that ABD1 could completely fulfill the actin-binding function of STARS in muscle, therefore, leaving ABD2 available for other potential functions within muscle (Fogl et al, 2011).…”
Section: Localization and Activation Of Starsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The size of the protein increased in the course of evolution from a short, 81 residue version called COSTARS [ 9 ] in the smallest known eukaryotes via a version of about 150 residues in insects and nematodes and just under 400 amino acids in vertebrates [ 10 ] ( S1 Fig ). The protein was shown to bind to F-actin [ 3 , 10 ], which was increased by its interaction with ABLIM-1/2 [ 11 ]. We were able to show that only its highly conserved C-terminus assumes a well-folded structure, while the rest of the protein is highly flexible and unfolded [ 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%