2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-4076(01)00128-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A structural labour supply model with flexible preferences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
90
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
90
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to methodological differences and due to the fact that I estimate elasticities with respect to participation tax rates, while Bargain et al (2014) estimate responsiveness to net wages and non-labor income, a direct comparison of my results with Bargain et al (2014) is rather difficult. Nevertheless, both studies have found substantially smaller female labor supply elasticities than was found in most of the previous literature (Arellano & Meghir, 1992;Callan, van Soest, & Walsh, 2009;Laroque & Salanié, 2002;van Soest, Das, & Gong, 2002). Both studies also found a substantial heterogeneity of labor supply elasticities across countries (with the UK and the Southern-European countries being among the largest-elasticity countries), and across groups of women (with the largest participation elasticity among single mothers).…”
mentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Due to methodological differences and due to the fact that I estimate elasticities with respect to participation tax rates, while Bargain et al (2014) estimate responsiveness to net wages and non-labor income, a direct comparison of my results with Bargain et al (2014) is rather difficult. Nevertheless, both studies have found substantially smaller female labor supply elasticities than was found in most of the previous literature (Arellano & Meghir, 1992;Callan, van Soest, & Walsh, 2009;Laroque & Salanié, 2002;van Soest, Das, & Gong, 2002). Both studies also found a substantial heterogeneity of labor supply elasticities across countries (with the UK and the Southern-European countries being among the largest-elasticity countries), and across groups of women (with the largest participation elasticity among single mothers).…”
mentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The general idea of most of the simulated hypothetical reforms was to introduce changes that reduce more or less explicit/direct work disincentives that result form original structure and rules of existing tax and benefit systems. The reforms involved changes in general tax rules (Aaberge et al, 1995;Aaberge et al, 1999;Haan 2010;Van Soest, 1995), as well as changes in the tax and benefit rules affecting families from the lower end of income distribution, such as changes of tax free amounts or tax cuts/deductions (Van Soest et al 2002;Flood et al, 2004;Van Soest, 1995) or changes in benefits or tax credits (e.g. Bargain et al, 2010;Creedy and Kalb 2005;Keane and Moffit, 1998;Bingley and Walker, 1997;Flood, et al 2004;Hoynes, 1996;Keane and Moffit 1998).…”
Section: Estimating Consequences Of Policies Using the Microsimulatiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore it has been applied extensively, see Bargain and Orsini (2006) and Bonin et al (2002). Van Soest et al (2002) applied an even more general polynomial specification (up to the fifth degree).…”
Section: Functional Forms Of the Utility Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%