2000
DOI: 10.1002/1099-0682(200007)2000:7<1657::aid-ejic1657>3.0.co;2-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Structurally Characterised Pair of Dicobalt(III) Peroxo/Superoxo Complexes withC2-Symmetrical Tetrapodal Pentadentate Amine Ligands, and Some Reactivity en route

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the context of O 2 reduction, cobalt­(II) complexes bearing multidentate ligands have been widely studied because of the propensity of these d 7 centers to bind O 2 (usually reversibly) to yield [LCo­(III)­O 2 ·] n superoxo monomers that can be reactive intermediates themselves ,, or be trapped by a second [LCo­(II)] to yield [LCo­(III)–O–O–Co­(III)­L] 2 n peroxo dimers, in which “end-on” Pauling-type binding is generally the norm (Scheme ). Another possibility involves (formal) trapping of the superoxo monomer with an [LCo­(III)] center to give a superoxo dimer; these are thought to be key species in water-selective O 2 reduction reactions involving binuclear Co catalysts (see below) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of O 2 reduction, cobalt­(II) complexes bearing multidentate ligands have been widely studied because of the propensity of these d 7 centers to bind O 2 (usually reversibly) to yield [LCo­(III)­O 2 ·] n superoxo monomers that can be reactive intermediates themselves ,, or be trapped by a second [LCo­(II)] to yield [LCo­(III)–O–O–Co­(III)­L] 2 n peroxo dimers, in which “end-on” Pauling-type binding is generally the norm (Scheme ). Another possibility involves (formal) trapping of the superoxo monomer with an [LCo­(III)] center to give a superoxo dimer; these are thought to be key species in water-selective O 2 reduction reactions involving binuclear Co catalysts (see below) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[20] Notably, the CoÀ O distance of 1.8930(17) Å as well as the OÀ O distance of 1.442(5) Å (Table S3) are in line with the ones reported for other pentaamine Co III À O 2 complexes. [26,73,74] Moreover, X-band EPR analysis in perpendicular mode of solid Co 2 O 2 {i-N 4 } 2 gave no signal as expected and the spectrum of the re-dissolved complex (1 mM) S20). These findings also suggest that Co 2 (O 2 ){i-N 4 } 2 is formed as a main species from the reaction of Co{i-N 4 } with O 2 and are in line with previous studies on the cyclam derivative Co{N 4 } which described that different CoÀ O 2 species are formed depending on the Co complex/O 2 ratio.…”
Section: Orr Capability and Reactivity Towards Omentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Each cobalt ion is surrounded by the N4 ligand and one carboxylate oxygen atom of MPA and a peroxide oxygen. In the peroxo moiety, the O–O bond distance is observed at 1.384(10) Å, which falls on the lower side of the range of O–O distances (1.34–1.53 Å) observed in the reported peroxo-bridged dicobalt­(III) complexes but is higher than the superoxide bond length (average 1.33 Å). ,,, The two cobalt centers in 5P1 are separated at a distance of 4.005 Å. The Co–N bond distances are found to be in the range 1.914–1.935 Å, although the Co1–N2 (2.013 Å) and Co2–N7 (2.005 Å) distances are significantly elongated due to the trans effect of the peroxide moiety .…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%