2010
DOI: 10.1002/cmdc.200900500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Structure‐Based Virtual Screening Approach toward the Discovery of Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors: Identification of Promising Zinc‐Chelating Groups

Abstract: The inhibitors of histone deacetylases (HDACs) have drawn a great deal of attention due to their promising potential as small-molecule therapeutics for the treatment of cancer. By means of virtual screening with docking simulations under consideration of the effects of ligand solvation, we were able to identify six novel HDAC inhibitors with IC(50) values ranging from 1 to 100 muM. These newly identified inhibitors are structurally diverse and have various chelating groups for the active site zinc ion, includi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A value of +0.8 is used to simulate the +2 charge in order to compensate for the tendency of Autodock to overestimate electrostatic interactions. [33] The geometry around the metal was based on the X-ray crystal structure of Cu-GGH and was restricted to a square planar configuration. [17] a Lamarckian Genetic Algorithm and the following parameters were used for docking: population size of 150, a random starting position and conformation, a maximal mutation of 2Å in translation and 50° in rotations (elitism of 5), iterations of Solis and Wets local search of 300, torsional degrees of freedom of 23 for the peptide complex, an external grid energy of 1000 kcal/mol, a mutation rate of 0.02 and a crossover rate of 0.8, and local search rate of 0.06.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A value of +0.8 is used to simulate the +2 charge in order to compensate for the tendency of Autodock to overestimate electrostatic interactions. [33] The geometry around the metal was based on the X-ray crystal structure of Cu-GGH and was restricted to a square planar configuration. [17] a Lamarckian Genetic Algorithm and the following parameters were used for docking: population size of 150, a random starting position and conformation, a maximal mutation of 2Å in translation and 50° in rotations (elitism of 5), iterations of Solis and Wets local search of 300, torsional degrees of freedom of 23 for the peptide complex, an external grid energy of 1000 kcal/mol, a mutation rate of 0.02 and a crossover rate of 0.8, and local search rate of 0.06.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors were able to identify six novel HDAC inhibitors with IC 50 values in the low micromolar range using the commercially available BIOMOL HDAC fluorescence assay. 65 Interestingly, these inhibitors contain zinc-chelating groups not previously reported for HDAC inhibitors, including the N- [1,3,4]thiadiazol-2-yl-sulfonamide group (compounds 8-10, Fig. 5).…”
Section: Virtual Screening Studiesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…65 Park et al docked 180,000 molecules from the InterBioScreen database into homology model of HDAC1. The model had been validated by docking known inhibitors of HDAC1 into the model structure.…”
Section: Virtual Screening Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, novel inhibitors can be predicted in silico by probing a database of a large chemical library. For instance, both structure-based and ligand-based virtual screenings have been applied for identification of selective HDAC inhibitors (Liu et al, 2010;Park et al, 2010;Wang et al, 2013) with the most recent study by Huang et al (2016), in which virtual screening and experimental validation of HDAC8 inhibitors was performed. Other modeling approaches including pharmacophore modeling (Chen et al, 2008), flexible docking, and three-dimensional QSAR (3D-QSAR) (Nair et al, 2012) have been used for the identification of selective HDAC inhibitors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%