2013
DOI: 10.1109/tpwrs.2013.2257887
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Structure-Preserving Model and Sufficient Condition for Frequency Synchronization of Lossless Droop Inverter-Based AC Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
61
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notice that, with the exception of the inertial terms M iθi and the possibly non-unit coefficients D i , the power network dynamics (8)-(10) are a perfect electrical analog of the coupled oscillator model (1) with ω i ∈ {−P l,i , P m,i , P d,i }. Thus, it is not surprising that scientists from different disciplines recently advocated coupled oscillator approaches to analyze synchronization in power networks (Tanaka et al, 1997;Subbarao et al, 2001;Hill and Chen, 2006;Filatrella et al, 2008;Buzna et al, 2009;Fioriti et al, 2009;Simpson-Porco et al, 2013;Dörfler and Bullo, 2012b;Rohden et al, 2012;Dörfler et al, 2013;Mangesius et al, 2012;Motter et al, 2013;Ainsworth and Grijalva, 2013). The theoretical tools presented in this article establish how frequency synchronization in power networks depend on the nodal parameters (P l,i , P m,i , P d,i ) as well as the interconnecting electrical network with weights a ij .…”
Section: Electric Power Network With Synchronous Generators and Dc/amentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Notice that, with the exception of the inertial terms M iθi and the possibly non-unit coefficients D i , the power network dynamics (8)-(10) are a perfect electrical analog of the coupled oscillator model (1) with ω i ∈ {−P l,i , P m,i , P d,i }. Thus, it is not surprising that scientists from different disciplines recently advocated coupled oscillator approaches to analyze synchronization in power networks (Tanaka et al, 1997;Subbarao et al, 2001;Hill and Chen, 2006;Filatrella et al, 2008;Buzna et al, 2009;Fioriti et al, 2009;Simpson-Porco et al, 2013;Dörfler and Bullo, 2012b;Rohden et al, 2012;Dörfler et al, 2013;Mangesius et al, 2012;Motter et al, 2013;Ainsworth and Grijalva, 2013). The theoretical tools presented in this article establish how frequency synchronization in power networks depend on the nodal parameters (P l,i , P m,i , P d,i ) as well as the interconnecting electrical network with weights a ij .…”
Section: Electric Power Network With Synchronous Generators and Dc/amentioning
confidence: 87%
“…, n}, see , Lemma 3) for a formal proof. Along the same lines, condition (27) can also be extended from a single node to a cutset in the graph (Ainsworth and Grijalva, 2013, Theorem 1).…”
Section: Lemma 42 (Necessary Sync Condition)mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In order to preserve the identity of all grid components, including DICs, loads, and lines, and provide more physical interpretations among them, we will use the network-preserving models to depict dynamical interactions among various components in micro-grids [34], [35]. Network-preserving models are usually described by differential and algebraic equations (DAE).…”
Section: A Model Descriptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model is essentially a weighted graph where each node represents a commonvoltage point of power injection, and branches represent microgrid node-interconnecting lines [16], [1].…”
Section: Decentralised Droop Control Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%