2022
DOI: 10.1002/crq.21361
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A structured reflection for improving third party interventions and mediation practice: Reconsidering debrief

Abstract: We make a case for structured reflective practice for improving third-party interventions and mediation decision-making and outcomes. We propose that a lack of awareness of the automatic, intuitive nature of judgments that dominate the fast-paced and uncertain mediation circumstances risk a proper treatment of implicit social-psychological matters driving conflict and suitably addressing substantive issues. Implicit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Curhan et al's survey research (Curhan et al, 2006) reported that both in personal and business negotiations, negotiators did not rate the tangible outcomes, such as terms of the agreement, as more important than other factors including relationship quality, being listened to, and morality. Contrastingly, the mediator's inclination to agree on intangible goals was reported (Kruk, 1998), even when mediators said they would focus on identity and relational issues (Peleg‐Baker & Lang, 2022). To resolve a discrepancy between the negotiator's preference and the mediator's inclination, it is important to remind the mediators of the essential qualities to facilitate relational transformation and the dangers of neglecting them, but the studies using data from a real mediation session that focuses on relational issues is extremely limited (Kressel et al, 2012).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Curhan et al's survey research (Curhan et al, 2006) reported that both in personal and business negotiations, negotiators did not rate the tangible outcomes, such as terms of the agreement, as more important than other factors including relationship quality, being listened to, and morality. Contrastingly, the mediator's inclination to agree on intangible goals was reported (Kruk, 1998), even when mediators said they would focus on identity and relational issues (Peleg‐Baker & Lang, 2022). To resolve a discrepancy between the negotiator's preference and the mediator's inclination, it is important to remind the mediators of the essential qualities to facilitate relational transformation and the dangers of neglecting them, but the studies using data from a real mediation session that focuses on relational issues is extremely limited (Kressel et al, 2012).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in the Navajo Justice and Harmony Ceremony, harmonious relationships are more important than problem‐solving (Bluehouse & Zion, 1993; Walker, 2004). Also in the context of Western mediation, more focus on restoring relationships is called for (Bush & Folger, 1994; Keashly et al, 1993; Peleg‐Baker & Lang, 2022; Ross, 2000). Relationship matters especially to those who have no choice but to continue to live together with the conflicting other in the same space, such as their school, family home, neighborhood, or workplace, whether an agreement was made or not.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%