A Structured Review Addressing the Use of Radiographic Measures of Alignment and the Definition of Acceptability in Patients with Distal Radius Fractures

Abstract

Background Standard radiographs are routinely used in clinical care to characterize the severity of a distal radius fracture and to monitor patients following a distal radius fracture. The objective of this review was to describe the range and variability of radiographic measures described in the literature in patients following a distal radius fracture. Methods A structured literature review was conducted using the Embase and PubMed databases. Inclusion criteria included full-text publications which employed radiographic measures to examine 100 or more participants following a distal radius fracture. A standardized data extraction form was used to identify study design, fracture classification systems, the types of and definitions of radiographic measurements, and acceptability criteria following distal radius fractures. Results From an initial 263 studies, 31 studies were included in the final data extraction process. A narrative synthesis of the articles included in this review indicated that there was a set of commonly used radiographic measurements examined in patients with a distal radius fracture which included radial inclination, volar/dorsal tilt, intra-articular step/gap, and a measure of ulnar variance/radial shortening. While 52 % of studies referenced or published a standardized measurement technique, there was substantial variability in the actual description of each radiographic measurement performed. Conclusions Substantial variability in how radiographic measurements are defined in large clinical studies as seen in this review suggest a need for consensus on the assessment and interpretations of radiographic measures used in patients following a distal radius fracture. Guidelines for radiographic measures should be established to ensure consistency between research and treatment centers.

Prevalence of posttraumatic arthritis and the association with outcome measures following distal radius fractures in non-osteoporotic patients: a systematic review

“…These conflicting results on predicting radiological factors could be due to a substantial variability in how these factors are defined in literature. It has been suggested to develop guidelines to ensure consistency when interpreting different radiographic measurements reported in literature [ 50 ].…”

Correlation Between Radiological Parameters and Functional Outcomes in Patients Older Than 60 Years of Age With Distal Radius Fracture

“…3,6 The discrepancy between "form and function" has been attributed to a lack of highly powered studies employing standardized outcome measures while controlling for confounding variables such a fracture type, age, criteria used to define DRF displacement, and radiologic parameters and ranges of values that define acceptable fracture reduction. 13,25,28 Another important factor is the lack of standardized radiographic measures; authors such as Kreder et al have attempted to establish normative guidelines for radiographic measurements following DRF. 26 However, it is unclear if standardized approaches for taking radiographic measures are consistently being used or even if there is consistent interpretation of these radiographic measures.…”

Radiographic characteristics of wrists in idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome patients

“…1). The radial inclination, ulnar variance, volar tilt are most often used parameters to identify malalignment of the wrist [17]. The transverse and antero-posterior diameter were measured to estimate the carpal tunnel sizes.…”