A Study of Airplane Excrescence Drag

Pfeiffer, Neal J.; Lednicer, David

doi:10.2514/6.2014-2866

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Excrescence drag due to surface roughness is accounted for by using 2%-3% of component parasite drag as roughness drag (Pfeiffer and Lednicer, 2014). Some airlines use visual perception to increase the cleaning for their transport aircraft or increase the intensive cleaning schedule to improve the surface roughness, but frequent cleaning can easily cause accidental damage to the fuselage skin, increase the chance of operating errors (such as using the wrong detergent), increase maintenance costs and may not have the fuel-saving beneficial result (to take wing waxing as an example).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Irregular deviation of flight control surface monitoring for jet transport aircraft

Chang

Shi

et al. 2022

AEAT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to present the irregular deviation examination of flight control surfaces and the potential problem diagnosis of irregular deviations for the jet transport aircraft. A four-jet transport aircraft at transonic flight in cruise phase is the study case of the present article. Design/methodology/approach The standard lift-to-drag ratio (L/D) and flight dynamic models are established through flight data mining and the fuzzy logic modeling technique based on the flight data of quick access recorder available in the Flight Operations Quality Assurance (FOQA) program of the airlines. The irregular deviations of flight control surfaces are examined by the standard L/D model-predicted results through sensitivity analysis. The contribution values in L/D deficiency are predicted by the deviations and the L/D derivatives of all influencing variables in Taylor series expansion. The potential problems due to irregular deviations can be excavated by the flight dynamic models through the analysis of in-flight stability and controllability. Findings The magnitude of stabilizer angle to the deficiency of L/D is the largest among the four control surfaces and elevator is the second one through the judgment of contribution values in L/D deficiency. The stabilizer has irregular deviations with obvious endplay problems of jackscrew, as found in the present study. The stabilizer is suggested to have the unscheduled maintenance for the flight control rigging. Research limitations/implications The specific transport aircraft of the standard L/D model should be the best one in L/D performance among all transport aircraft in the fleet of the airlines. The present method is a new concept to monitor the irregular deviation of flight control surface. The study case of the four-jet transport aircraft at transonic flight in cruise phase is illustrated as the standard L/D mode. The required flight data of monitored flight is requested to eliminate the biases through compatibility checks. The flight data of study case in the present study is also illustrated as monitored flight data. Practical implications To diagnose the irregular deviations of flight control surface deflected angles with contributing to the L/D deficiency estimation is an innovation to improve the flight data analysis of FOQA program for airlines. If the irregular deviation problems of control surfaces can be fixed after rigging in maintenance, the goal of flight safety and aviation fuel saving will be achieved. Social implications The flight control surface rigging of unscheduled maintenance is not expected to coincide with an airline’s peak season or unavailable space in hangar. The optimal time of unscheduled maintenance for the flight control rigging will be easily decided through the correlations between excessive fuel cost and flight safety. Originality/value This method can be used to assist airlines to monitor irregular angular positions of flight control surfaces as a complementary tool for management to improve aviation safety, operation and operational efficiency.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%