Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management 2019
DOI: 10.1145/3357384.3358095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Study of Context Dependencies in Multi-page Product Search

Abstract: In product search, users tend to browse results on multiple search result pages (SERPs) (e.g., for queries on clothing and shoes) before deciding which item to purchase. Users' clicks can be considered as implicit feedback which indicates their preferences and used to re-rank subsequent SERPs. Relevance feedback (RF) techniques are usually involved to deal with such scenarios. However, these methods are designed for document retrieval, where relevance is the most important criterion. In contrast, product searc… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicates that incorporating aspect-value information into search optimizations is generally beneficial for the performance of product search systems. 4 After a 5-round iterative feedback process, we observe different results for different feedback models. For term-based negative feedback models such as Rocchios, SingleNeg, and MultiNeg, we observe little performance improvement during the feedback process.…”
Section: Overall Retrieval Performancementioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This indicates that incorporating aspect-value information into search optimizations is generally beneficial for the performance of product search systems. 4 After a 5-round iterative feedback process, we observe different results for different feedback models. For term-based negative feedback models such as Rocchios, SingleNeg, and MultiNeg, we observe little performance improvement during the feedback process.…”
Section: Overall Retrieval Performancementioning
confidence: 96%
“…Later, Ai et al [1] noticed that product search can be personalized and proposed a hierarchical embedding model based on product reviews for personalized product search. Recently, Bi et al [4] studied different context dependencies in multi-page product search.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary reason is that such datasets contain confidential or proprietary information, and e-commerce platforms do not wish to take this risk. To cite an example, [49][50][51]worked on LTR with Walmart and Amazon datasets, but the datasets are not published. There are a few datasets for clustering, or recommendation systems, but as the number of features are very less (e.g.…”
Section: Dataset Availabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early studies on product search focus on retrieving products based on structured product facets such as brands and categories [17,18,35]. However, as there exists a significant vocabulary gap between user queries and product descriptions [46,60], state-of-the-art approaches usually conduct product search in latent space with deep learning techniques [8,25,67]. For example, Bi et al [7? ] extract fine-grained review information with embedding networks; Guo et al [24] model long/short term user preferences with attention networks over user query history.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%