2013
DOI: 10.1589/jpts.25.61
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Study of Functional Dysphagia Scale Improvements after Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation

Abstract: Abstract.[Purpose] The main objective of this study was to provide basic data on the functional dysphagia scale after Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES).[Subjects] Subjects were divided into normal persons aged over 70 (N=18) and normal persons younger than 30 (N=10).[Method] Each group underwent videofluoroscopy and the Functional Dysphagia Scale (FDS) was used to evaluate subjects' swallowing characteristics. The aged group underwent a second videofluoroscopy and FDS evaluation after NMES. NMES was … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Swallowing function was also evaluated at baseline and following the 6-week training intervention using the videofluoroscopic dysphagia scale (VDS) based on videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS). VFSSs were conduct based on a previous study 8 ) . The VDS consists of 14 items, which can largely be categorized into an oral phase (7 items: lip closure, bolus formation, mastication, apraxia, tongue to palate contact premature bolus loss, and oral transit time) and a pharyngeal phase (7 items: pharyngeal triggering, vallecular residues, pyriform sinus resides, laryngeal elevation, pharyngeal wall coating, pharyngeal transit time, and aspiration).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Swallowing function was also evaluated at baseline and following the 6-week training intervention using the videofluoroscopic dysphagia scale (VDS) based on videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS). VFSSs were conduct based on a previous study 8 ) . The VDS consists of 14 items, which can largely be categorized into an oral phase (7 items: lip closure, bolus formation, mastication, apraxia, tongue to palate contact premature bolus loss, and oral transit time) and a pharyngeal phase (7 items: pharyngeal triggering, vallecular residues, pyriform sinus resides, laryngeal elevation, pharyngeal wall coating, pharyngeal transit time, and aspiration).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike complementary treatment and TTOS, which are covered by health insurance, NMES is excluded from coverage, making it expensive. Nevertheless, NMES treatment is not merely frequently conducted for sub-acute dysphagia but is performed by 72.3% of swallowing treatment experts 14 , 15 ) . Therefore, it is necessary to prescribe guidelines for swallowing treatment considering the economic difficulties of patients with dysphagia; accordingly, future comparisons of the effectiveness and economic considerations of various swallowing treatments are required.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subjective measures show large effect sizes while objective measures from videofluoroscopy show no significant improvement 38 . A case series evaluated the use of electrical stimulation in normal adults over 70 years of age on a functional dysphagia scale with significant improvement and moderate effect sizes 40 . Another study assesed swallowing after 12 sessions of electrical stimulation with dysphagia therapy followed by 12 sessions of traditional swallowing therapy 41 .…”
Section: Combined Direct and Indirect Therapy Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%