A Study of GPS Carrier-Phase Time Transfer Noise Based on NIST GPS Receivers

Abstract

To do a better time comparison between high-precision clocks (such as a Cesium-fountain clock and Hydrogen-maser clock), we want to study and eventually lower the GPS carrier-phase time transfer noise. The GPS carrier-phase time transfer noise comes from four sources: GPS satellite, GPS signal path, ground receiving equipment (receiver and antenna), and data-processing algorithm. This paper focuses on the noise introduced by the ground receiving equipment. At NIST, we have installed seven GPS receivers. All receivers have the same reference time, i.e., UTC(NIST). Three of them are connected to the same antenna. The other four are connected to four different antennas. This architecture enables us to study the time-transfer noise from the ground receiving equipment. We study both long-term (> 100 days) noise and short-term (< 1 day) noise. For the long-term noise, the time-transfer result using one receiver can vary from that using another receiver by up to 1.8 ns, during 1.3 years. To achieve sub-nanosecond GPS timing accuracy, a careful monitoring of the time delays or a more frequent calibration is needed. For the short-term noise, we find that the common-clock difference between receivers using the same antenna is less noisy than that using two different antennas, at an averaging time of less than 0.5 hour. This indicates that the antenna and antenna cable contribute to the super-short-term noise of GPS carrier-phase time transfer significantly. In addition, the response to the GPS receiver's reference-time change is tested in this paper. The variation in the response can be up to ± 350 ps. Last, this paper gives the best carrier-phase time transfer result we can currently achieve with the available equipment at NIST. The best frequency stability is 4.0×10 −16 at 3 hours, 1.1×10 −16 at 1 day, 4.0×10 −17 at 10 days, and 1.3×10 −17 at 48 days.

On the potential of undifferenced and uncombined GNSS time and frequency transfer with integer ambiguity resolution and satellite clocks estimated

“…However, the current PPP-based time and frequency transfer techniques cannot meet the standard of optical clocks. To better understand the potential of GNSS in time and frequency, it is necessary to study the impacts of the GNSS algorithm and equipment (Yao and Levine 2016), as this will determine whether GNSS can serve the optical clocks in the future.…”

Solution for wireless time synchronization using sub-Nyquist sampling rates

“…While the code-based method is reliable, it is often not very accurate and needs to be supported by other means such as measuring the phase of the carrier wave of the wireless signal if high accuracy is needed [3,4]. Phase measurements have one significant disadvantage in that they are associated with ambiguities that need to be resolved before the delay can be accurately determined.…”