1991
DOI: 10.1080/07418829100091011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study of individual, environmental, and interactive effects in explaining adjustment to prison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
83
0
6

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
6
83
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, and according to importation theory, the influence of a prison on perceived prison conditions and inmate behaviour is rather small, or even absent. Over the past decades, several studies have confirmed the assumption that characteristics of inmates (their criminal history, identification with criminal values, attitudes towards the legal system, the age of inmates, prior incarcerations, the length of the current sentence, their race, and their gender) are important predictors of inmate perceptions of prison conditions and deviant behaviour (Bales et al 2005;Camp et al 2003;Gendreau et al 1997;Harer and Steffensmeier 1996;Lindquist and Lindquist 1997;Paterline and Petersen 1999;Spivak and Sharp 2008;Steiner 2009;Steiner and Wooldredge 2008;Wright 1991).…”
Section: Explanations Of Perceived Prison Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Consequently, and according to importation theory, the influence of a prison on perceived prison conditions and inmate behaviour is rather small, or even absent. Over the past decades, several studies have confirmed the assumption that characteristics of inmates (their criminal history, identification with criminal values, attitudes towards the legal system, the age of inmates, prior incarcerations, the length of the current sentence, their race, and their gender) are important predictors of inmate perceptions of prison conditions and deviant behaviour (Bales et al 2005;Camp et al 2003;Gendreau et al 1997;Harer and Steffensmeier 1996;Lindquist and Lindquist 1997;Paterline and Petersen 1999;Spivak and Sharp 2008;Steiner 2009;Steiner and Wooldredge 2008;Wright 1991).…”
Section: Explanations Of Perceived Prison Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Prior research has demonstrated that the frequency of misconduct is highest early in the sentence, typically reaching its peak six to nine months into the sentence, then falling steadily with the passage of time (Maguire, 1992;Toch, Adams, & Grant, 1989;Wright, 1991;Zamble, 1992). Inmate misconduct rates, particularly for individuals with short sentences, fit an inverted U-shaped curve (Flanagan, 1980).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…: Van Voorhis, 1994 ;Woolredge et al, 2001 ;Walters, 2003 ;Hochstetler et DeLisi, 2005), voire une confusion dans la séquence temporelle des événements (par ex. : Wright, 1991).…”
Section: Le Mmpiunclassified