2019
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab1503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study of inter-crystal scatter in dual-layer offset scintillator arrays for brain-dedicated PET scanners

Abstract: A PET insert, mounted in a MR scanner, provides virtually all the advantages of a fully integrated PET/MR scanner. Various PET inserts have been proposed and built for small animal (Goertzen et al 2016, Ko et al 2016) and brain (Kolb et al 2012, Nishikido et al 2014, Jung et al 2015) hybrid PET/MR imaging. The limited diameter of an animal or organ-dedicated PET insert enhances the parallax error at large radial offsets which leads to a resolution loss in the scanner. Depth-of-interaction (DOI) detectors have … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For PET detector designs such as individual crystal readout or multi-layered detector, all interaction positions of ICS events are possible to be measured, and the ICS events can then either be rejected or used by applying an ICS events recovery algorithm to find the first interaction position (Gu et al 2010, Geoffroy et al 2015, Abbaszadeh et al 2018, Peng et al 2018, Hsu et al 2019. Since the sensitivity of a PET scanner will be significantly reduced if the ICS events are rejected, recently lots of efforts had been spent on developing ICS event recovery algorithms to find the first interaction positions of the ICS events for different detector designs (Rafecas et al 2003, Gillam et al 2014, Lee et al 2018, Teimoorisichani and Goertzen 2019 or modelling the ICS process in image reconstruction so as to improve the image quality (Qi et al 1998a, 1998b, Alessio et al 2006, Stute et al 2011, Zeraatkar et al 2011. Since the cost of PET detectors with the capability to measure all interaction positions of ICS events is substantially higher, most current PET scanners still use block detectors, with the ratio of the number of crystals to the number of SiPMs being much larger than 1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For PET detector designs such as individual crystal readout or multi-layered detector, all interaction positions of ICS events are possible to be measured, and the ICS events can then either be rejected or used by applying an ICS events recovery algorithm to find the first interaction position (Gu et al 2010, Geoffroy et al 2015, Abbaszadeh et al 2018, Peng et al 2018, Hsu et al 2019. Since the sensitivity of a PET scanner will be significantly reduced if the ICS events are rejected, recently lots of efforts had been spent on developing ICS event recovery algorithms to find the first interaction positions of the ICS events for different detector designs (Rafecas et al 2003, Gillam et al 2014, Lee et al 2018, Teimoorisichani and Goertzen 2019 or modelling the ICS process in image reconstruction so as to improve the image quality (Qi et al 1998a, 1998b, Alessio et al 2006, Stute et al 2011, Zeraatkar et al 2011. Since the cost of PET detectors with the capability to measure all interaction positions of ICS events is substantially higher, most current PET scanners still use block detectors, with the ratio of the number of crystals to the number of SiPMs being much larger than 1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effect of ICS on PET image quality has been studied by several groups (Ritzer et al 2017, Teimoorisichani andGoertzen 2019). Accurately determining the true LORs can alleviate spatial blurring, eventually improving spatial resolution and lesion detectability of PET images (Surti and Karp 2018, Zhang et al 2019.…”
Section: Expected Impact Of the Methods On Image Quality Improvementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a significant number of the annihilation photons undergo single or multiple Compton scattering events within pixelated crystal arrays before the final photon interaction occurs, and we call them inter-crystal scatter (ICS) events (Rafecas et al 2003, Yamaya et al 2011, Abbaszadeh et al 2018. ICS events lead to the misalignment of true LORs owing to incorrect localization of the annihilation photons, thereby degrading the PET image contrast, spatial resolution, and lesion detectability (Miyaoka and Lewellen 2000, Teimoorisichani and Goertzen 2019, Zhang et al 2019.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%