1999
DOI: 10.1006/jpho.1999.0092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study of /J/ and /r/ in the light of the “DAC” coarticulation model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
62
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall trill durations were taken to be the sum of the durations of the corresponding contact and opening periods. Contact onset and offset were identified at the first frame showing activation or deactivation, respectively, of at least one electrode located at the four central alveolar columns [Recasens and Pallarès, 1999]. If the rhotic exhibited no electrode activation in this area, consonant onset was taken to occur at the first frame showing some constriction narrowing towards the center of the alveolar zone and/or a significant decrease in formant amplitude or an F1 inflection on the spectrographic representations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Overall trill durations were taken to be the sum of the durations of the corresponding contact and opening periods. Contact onset and offset were identified at the first frame showing activation or deactivation, respectively, of at least one electrode located at the four central alveolar columns [Recasens and Pallarès, 1999]. If the rhotic exhibited no electrode activation in this area, consonant onset was taken to occur at the first frame showing some constriction narrowing towards the center of the alveolar zone and/or a significant decrease in formant amplitude or an F1 inflection on the spectrographic representations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This appears to be the case in Eastern Catalan where, in comparison with /ɾ/, /r/ is more posterior, and exhibits a higher F1 and a lower F2 (1,286-1,440 vs. 1,527-2,024 Hz) since it involves a lower predorsum and jaw and some dorsopharyngeal approximation, and a lower F3 (2,437 vs. 2,679 Hz) since it is articulated with a more retracted constriction [Recasens and Pallarès, 1999]. Moreover, trills are produced with a longer first contact than taps, exhibit more gestural anticipation during a preceding antagonistic front vowel, and are more resistant to coarticulatory vowel effects in constriction location and tongue body configuration.…”
Section: Articulatory and Spectral Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Yet in both sub-corpora there is a strong preference for [ɾɹ̝ ] to appear close to a high vowel: overall, 63 of the total 84 occurrences were close to /i/, 21 close to /u/. In articulatory terms, high vowels being produced with anterodorsum raising are notoriously antagonistic to trills (Recasens, 2012;Recasens & Pallarès, 1999;Solé, 2002), and they also induce large v-to-c coarticulatory effects on taps (e.g., Celata, Vietti, & Spreafico, in press;Recasens & Pallarès, 1999).…”
Section: Rhotic Variability and The Individual Repertoire: Challengesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, let me suggest two possible phonetic explanations that could had been phonologized. On the one hand, the relatively slow gesture required for rhotics can create greater coarticulation effects between the vowel and the rhotic and lengthen the vowel as a result (Koen Sebregts p.c., Recasens and Pallarès 1999). On the other hand, in Riminese, all vowels preceding nasals are long (Hajek 1997).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%