1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0901-5027(97)80814-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study of mandibular ramus anatomy and its significance to sagittal split osteotomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
18
0
9

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
18
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence and positioning of mandibular third molars, surgeon inexperience, osteotomy design and mandibular morphology have been pointed as risk factors related to bad splits ( 4 ). There is a great concern in the literature about the fusion of the buccal and lingual mandibular cortical above the mandibular foramen (MF), since bad splits supposedly occur when an osteotomy is performed above or just at this point, at which there is no medullary bone ( 11 - 13 ). Previous investigations have suggested that lesions on the IAN are also more likely to occur in patients who present a thin medullary bone between the mandibular canal (MC) and the external mandibular cortical ( 14 , 15 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence and positioning of mandibular third molars, surgeon inexperience, osteotomy design and mandibular morphology have been pointed as risk factors related to bad splits ( 4 ). There is a great concern in the literature about the fusion of the buccal and lingual mandibular cortical above the mandibular foramen (MF), since bad splits supposedly occur when an osteotomy is performed above or just at this point, at which there is no medullary bone ( 11 - 13 ). Previous investigations have suggested that lesions on the IAN are also more likely to occur in patients who present a thin medullary bone between the mandibular canal (MC) and the external mandibular cortical ( 14 , 15 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 The results showed 64.8% of the fracture lines as proposed by Hunsuck and Epker,22.2% running to the posterior border of the ramus, and 13% through the mandibular canal. No unintentional or bad split was observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…20,21 A survey reported in 1997 examined the anatomy of the ramus focusing on the fusion of the lingual and buccal cortical bone and highlighted that an osteotomy more than 5 mm above the lingula increases the chance of a cut ending in an area of buccal and lingual cortical fusion. 22 Analyzing CT scans, another study showed that there is a high rate of class III patients who have a thinner anterior ramus and either a separation of cancellous bone at the level of the lingula or an absence of cancellous bone posterior to the lingula. 23 The authors considered that the extension of the osteotomy into an area with both less buccolingual thickness and less cancellous bone increases the rate of bad splits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lingula has been an important landmark to perform the sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO), the most widely used surgical technique for correction of mandible positioning. On SSRO, the horizontal cut on the medial aspect of the mandible is done just above to the lingual (Cillo & Stella;Tom et al, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%