2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study of mega project from a perspective of social conflict theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
71
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
71
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Different theorists such as Jia et al (2011), Storey & Hamilton (2004 and Ponzini (2011) in scope of urban policy-making and planning have assessed positive and negative social effects of urban megaprojects on city and citizens. According to these theorists, negative effects of these projects include social injustice, migration of resident population, elimination of identity and character of urban context, social isolation of some groups, and economic benefits for few investors, failure to meet the need for housing and employment of low-income groups, public persistence etc.…”
Section: Theoretical Literature Urban Megaprojectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Different theorists such as Jia et al (2011), Storey & Hamilton (2004 and Ponzini (2011) in scope of urban policy-making and planning have assessed positive and negative social effects of urban megaprojects on city and citizens. According to these theorists, negative effects of these projects include social injustice, migration of resident population, elimination of identity and character of urban context, social isolation of some groups, and economic benefits for few investors, failure to meet the need for housing and employment of low-income groups, public persistence etc.…”
Section: Theoretical Literature Urban Megaprojectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Urban megaprojects can effect on many social groups in accordance with their broad effective domain. There are some negative and positive social effects of implementation of urban megaprojects including demographic migrations and movements in cities due, establishment of new native and non-native groups in context of city, change in former identity and character of context, creation of an alien physical environment for residents and workers, effect on type and quality of job in city or false promises about social reforms, settlement of social crisis and increase in job opportunities and low-cost housing (Jia et al, 2011, P. 817, Storey & Hamilton, 2004, P. 282 & Ponzini, 2011.…”
Section: Introduction Statement Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attractive virtues of SEM include: 1) assumptions underlying the statistical analyses are testable giving the investigator full control and enabling furthering understanding of the analyses; 2) regression coefficients, means, and variances can be compared simultaneously; and 3) ability to fit nonstandard models, including longitudinal data, databases with time series analysis, and databases with nonnormally distributed variables [25]. In the construction management, SEM was used for describing and quantifying the influence of situational factors in project environments [26][27].…”
Section: Structural Equation Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mega-projects, which take place in both the public and private sectors, are united by their extreme complexity, their criticality to society and by a long record of poor delivery (Li & Guo, 2011). Mega-projects are globally recognized instruments of economic growth and urbanization (Altshuler & Luberoff, 2003;Baev &Overland, 2010;Fainstein, 2008;Olds, 2011;Ponzini, 2011) though their benefits are contested (de Bruijn & Leijten, 2007;Jia, Yang et al, 2011;Novy & Peters, 2012;Shatkin, 2011). What to do in the face of this dichotomous dilemma of performance and importance is an issue that remains unresolved by mega-project practitioners and academics alike.…”
Section: Mega-projects and Their Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%