A Study of Patient-Physician Communication and Barriers in Communication

Abstract

Context: Effective doctor-patient communication is the basic requirement in building a good doctor-patient relationship. Safe practices and effective, patient-centered communication is key to quality care. Good doctor-patient communication has the potential to help regulate patients' emotions, facilitate comprehension of medical information and allow for better identification of patients' needs, perceptions and expectations. Doctors with better communication and interpersonal skills are able to detect problems earlier, can prevent medical crisis and expensive intervention, and provide better support to their patients.Current research indicates that ineffective communication among healthcare professionals is one of the leading causes of medical errors and patient harm. There are many barriers to good communication in the doctor-patient relationship, including patients' anxiety and fear, doctors' burden of work, fear of litigation, fear of physical or verbal abuse, and unrealistic patient expectations. National accreditation board for hospitals and healthcare providers (NABH) standards and international patient safety goals focus on the importance of effective communication in healthcare settings and how it leads to patient safety.This study is an attempt to identify gaps in patient physician communication in the current healthcare settings, find the barriers in communication and give recommendation to enhance good practices in the future. Aims:The aim of the study is to analyze the current levels of effective patient communication in a tertiary care hospital in Delhi-NCR with help of a self-administered questionnaire. The study will assess the level of information shared with the patient. Settings and design:The design of our proposed study is a descriptive study where we will use a self-administered questionnaire to assess the level of patient-physician communication in the selected study setting. Materials and methods:The NABH standard were used as a guideline for preparing the self-administered questionnaire. All admitted vulnerable patients of the selected study area will consist of the population for the study. Simple random sampling technique will be used to derive the sample out of the population. Statistical analysis used:Correlation and analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to establish associations between the independent and dependent variables. Results:The study shows that 48% of the respondents were of opinion that they were given partial information, while 20% of the respondents alleged that they were not given any information about the explanation of their disease, its prognosis and the treatment option that were available, i.e. a total of 62% of the patients said that they had partial information to complete lack of information that would have made them aware of their diseases, its prognosis and the treatments options available to cure it, while only 32% of the patients agreed that they were supplied with thorough information during their interaction with the physicians. Conclusion:The majority of...

Provider and coach perspectives on implementing shadow coaching to improve provider–patient interactions

“…Research suggests several barriers to improving physician patient communication: high workload for physicians, low medical literacy of patients and physician's low awareness of communication skills 39‐42 . Our findings identified several similar implementation barriers for organizations to address related to time pressures within a given patient encounter 43‐45 and language/translation issues 46,47 .…”

Optimizing primary healthcare experience: assessing client satisfaction in Kaduna State, Northwest Nigeria

“…Studies conducted in other part of Nigeria, relating to clients’ satisfaction revealed that overall client satisfaction ranges between 62.6%—90% [ 17 , 18 ] with some of the clients being dissatisfied with PHC services. However, the respondents showed an average level of dissatisfaction with the general cleanliness of the facility and a relatively higher level (64%) of dissatisfaction with waiting areas [ 19 , 20 ]. Studies also revealed that respondents were dissatisfied with distance of the facility with their dwellings, working hours of facilities, language barriers, attitude of healthcare workers, client–provider interpersonal interaction and relationship, hospital facilities, missing records, quality access to care, and cost of treatment [ 21 – 23 ].…”