2018
DOI: 10.1142/s0218271818500335
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study of perturbations in scalar–tensor theory using 1 + 3 covariant approach

Abstract: This work discusses scalar-tensor theories of gravity, with a focus on the Brans-Dicke subclass, and one that also takes note of the latter's equivalence with f (R) gravitation theories. A 1+3 covariant formalism is used in this case to discuss covariant perturbations on a background Friedmann-Laimaître-Robertson-Walker (FLRW) space-time. Linear perturbation equations are developed, based on gauge-invariant gradient variables. Both scalar and harmonic decompositions are applied to obtain second-order equations… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scalar-tensor theories of gravity 41,64,65,[175][176][177][178][179][180][181][182][183][184][185][186][187] are a generalization of the Brans-Dicke theory to allow the BD coupling to be a function of the scalar field: ω BD → ω(φ), i. e., to be a varying parameter:…”
Section: Scalar-tensor Theoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Scalar-tensor theories of gravity 41,64,65,[175][176][177][178][179][180][181][182][183][184][185][186][187] are a generalization of the Brans-Dicke theory to allow the BD coupling to be a function of the scalar field: ω BD → ω(φ), i. e., to be a varying parameter:…”
Section: Scalar-tensor Theoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where Λ is an integration constant. Hence, the Friedmann equation in (184) reads: 3Ĥ 2 = Λ, and sinceφ = 0, the relationship (185) implies that in the Jordan frame we will have also a GR-de Sitter solution H =Ĥ = Λ/3. From the relationship (185) it follows, besides, that there can be other de Sitter solutions in the Jordan frame (H = H 0 ), that would require an evolving scalar field ϕ = ϕ(t) which compensates the time evolution of the EF Hubble parameter:…”
Section: Final Comments On the Non-universality Of The Gr-de Sitter Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 1 + 3 covariant approach has been applied to study scalar perturbations in f (R) gravity [9,[19][20][21]. It is also studied in [22], where the approach was used to explore the equivalence between 0123456789(). : V,-vol scalar-tensor theory and f (R) gravity but they used a different definition of the scalar field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Linear perturbations have severally been discussed in f (R) models in different studies using different approach [19,[21][22][23][24][25][26]. In these studies, the investigation between dark energy and f (R) models was done by analysing the behavior of scalar perturbations around FLRW background.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the 1 + 3 covariant formalism, the perturbations defined describe true physical degrees of freedom and no physical gauge modes exist. In recent years, there has been active research on cosmological perturbations theory for both GR [38][39][40][41] and different extended gravity theories [34,35,42] using the 1+3 covariant formalism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%