1982
DOI: 10.1109/proc.1982.12378
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study of photoelectronic-digital radiology—Part II: Cost analysis of a photoelectronic-digital versus film-based system for radiology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1983
1983
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cost will be further reduced because the number of repeated examinations can be dramatically reduced with the use of the imaging plate technique. In a cost analysis by Nudelman et al of a photoelectronic digital radiology department, it was predicated that, although start-up costs are high, over time the photoelectronic-digital systems promise to be significantly less expensive than a film-based system for long-term hospital use [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cost will be further reduced because the number of repeated examinations can be dramatically reduced with the use of the imaging plate technique. In a cost analysis by Nudelman et al of a photoelectronic digital radiology department, it was predicated that, although start-up costs are high, over time the photoelectronic-digital systems promise to be significantly less expensive than a film-based system for long-term hospital use [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The costs and problems of such storage are well described by Dwyer et al [13] and Nudelman et al [14].…”
Section: Meeting Network Goalsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Early attempts to identify costs and benefits identified variables used today when evaluating P ACS. Cost/benefit analyses have focused on quantifying direct benefits in which the primary economic justification relates to buying, processing, and handling film and chemicals; storage space; labor for archiving and retrieving images; equipment; and film loss [11,15,[24][25][26].…”
Section: Evaluation Of Pacs Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%