2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4972(01)00016-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study of R&D, innovation, and business performance in the Canadian biotechnology industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
117
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 223 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
117
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We limit our sample to this industry because the propensity to patent is high, making patent data appropriate indicators of technological activity (Hall and Bagchi-Sen 2002;Porkolab 2002). The pharma sector provides an interesting sector for our study because it is characterised by a widely dispersed knowledge infrastructure in which both small and large firms play an important role.…”
Section: Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We limit our sample to this industry because the propensity to patent is high, making patent data appropriate indicators of technological activity (Hall and Bagchi-Sen 2002;Porkolab 2002). The pharma sector provides an interesting sector for our study because it is characterised by a widely dispersed knowledge infrastructure in which both small and large firms play an important role.…”
Section: Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sector, new technological opportunities often emerge from small high-tech biotechnology firms, companies tend to engage in a wide array of relationships in order to build a 'radar-function' on new technologies. Therefore, given the technological challenges, opportunities and costs of bringing new products to the market, companies in these sectors are extensively involved in strategic alliances with a variety of external partners (Hall and Bagchi-Sen 2002;McKelvey, Alm, and Riccaboni 2003). In particular, large pharmaceutical firms are building a large portfolio of relationships.…”
Section: Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Megna and Klock (1993), Ernst et al (2010), and Suzuki (2011) measured patent indicators and business performance. Other studies have discussed various R&D input indicators, including R&D expenditure (R&D intensity or technological overflow), R&D technology sources (self-innovation, introduction for modification, partial introduction, total introduction and returns of royalty) and R&D output (number of patents and the number of new products to the market) (Thomas 2001;Watanabe et al 2001;Hall, Bagchi-Sen 2002;Schoenecker, Swanson 2002;Reitzig 2003;Tseng, Wu 2007).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Expense of research and development is usually viewed as the input of technology ability (Griliches, 1990), since financial resource investing is the first stage to create new products or development new technology. However, there exists some problems, firstly, the uncertainty of research and development is high, and creating new product or new process takes a long time form investment to the market (Hall & Bagchi-Sen, 2002). Secondly, the output of research and development often contains great ambiguous, and it could not be identified and evaluating.…”
Section: Innovation Abilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, the output of research and development often contains great ambiguous, and it could not be identified and evaluating. Thirdly, the process of innovation is very complicated, it crosses several function from research, prototype development, commercialization, and to the end of market (Hall & Bagchi-Sen, 2002). The benefit might be revealed after several years.…”
Section: Innovation Abilitymentioning
confidence: 99%