1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf01108358
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study of race and gender bias in the punishment of handicapped school children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
130
2
5

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(147 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
10
130
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Do we use hairstyle and dress to form stereotypical judgments of our students' character and academic potential? Do we recommend corporal punishment and suspension for African Americans and in-school suspension for European Americans (McFadden, Marsh, Price, & Hwang, 1992)? Do we hold misbehaving White students by the hand when we march them down the hall, but hold misbehaving African American students by the wrist (Hyland, 2000)?…”
Section: Ability and Willingness To Use Culturally Appropriate Managementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Do we use hairstyle and dress to form stereotypical judgments of our students' character and academic potential? Do we recommend corporal punishment and suspension for African Americans and in-school suspension for European Americans (McFadden, Marsh, Price, & Hwang, 1992)? Do we hold misbehaving White students by the hand when we march them down the hall, but hold misbehaving African American students by the wrist (Hyland, 2000)?…”
Section: Ability and Willingness To Use Culturally Appropriate Managementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, suspension and expulsion increase chances of coming into contact with a delinquent subculture, setting up a vicious negative cycle of effects on schoolwork together with the stigma associated with those practices once the child returns to school (Williams 1989). Moreover, these practices -suspension and exclusion-do not modify the misbehaviour as they were designed to do, since rates of recidivism remain high among these students (McFadden et al 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This explicit prescription of what academic engagement looks like assumes that different behaviour is misbehaviour and therefore not academic engagement. Students who are likely to engage in behaviour that is read as disrespectful are boys, low income and racial and ethnic minority students (Bear, 1998;Cornbleth & Korth, 1980;Hale, 2001;McFadden, 1992). Subsequently, these students are punished.…”
Section: Academic Engagement and The Hidden Curriculummentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Their teachers generally rate them as ideal students in that they are considered compliant, pleasant and reserved--traits that are generally valued in school (Cornbleth & Korth, 1980;Mikel Brown, 1999). Perhaps not surprisingly, white girls are least likely to be suspended for disciplinary reasons (Hale, 2001;McFadden, 1992;Morgan, 1991). These findings support Hare and Castenell's (1985) assertion that 'the greater the commonality of characteristics and attitudes between student and teacher, the higher the possibility of positive outcomes' (p 210).…”
Section: Academic Engagement and The Hidden Curriculummentioning
confidence: 97%